Positron tomographic assessment of androgen receptors in prostatic carcinoma

被引:166
作者
Dehdashti, F [1 ]
Picus, J
Michalski, JM
Dence, CS
Siegel, BA
Katzenellenbogen, JA
Welch, MJ
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Alvin J Siteman Canc Ctr, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Edward Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Dept Chem, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
PET; prostate; cancer; androgen; receptor;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-005-1764-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of androgen receptor (AR) imaging with 16 beta[F-18]fluoro-5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone (FDHT) by positron emission tomography (PET) and to assess the binding selectivity of FDHT to AR in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: Twenty men (age range 56-87 years) with advanced prostate cancer were studied. All except one had metastatic disease confirmed by biopsy and/or radiological studies. One patient who had radiological findings suggesting a single hepatic metastasis was found to have focal fatty infiltration on biopsy obtained after FDHT-PET and was excluded from further data analysis. FDHT uptake was assessed semiquantitatively by determination of the standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumor-to-muscle ratio (T/M). Additionally, to assess the AR binding selectivity of FDHT, patients with one or more foci of abnormally increased FDHT accumulation were studied after administration of an AR antagonist (flutamide). Results: Conventional imaging demonstrated innumerable lesions in two patients and 43 lesions in the remaining 17 patients with advanced prostate cancer. FDHT-PET was positive in 12 of 19 patients (sensitivity of 63%), including the two patients with innumerable lesions. FDHT-PET detected 24 of 28 known lesions (86%) in the remaining ten patients. In addition, FDHT-PET detected 17 unsuspected lesions in five of these ten patients. All 12 patients with positive FDHT-PET underwent a repeat PET study after receiving flutamide for 1 day (250 mg t.i.d.). In all of these patients, there was a decrease in tumor FDHT uptake after flutamide; the mean (+/- standard deviation) SUV and T/M decreased from 7.0 +/- 4.7 and 6.9 +/- 3.9, respectively, to 3.0 +/- 1.5 and 3.0 +/- 1.6, respectively (p=0.002). The mean PSA in patients with positive FDHT-PET was significantly higher than that in patients with negative FDHT-PET (p=0.006). Conclusion: Our results document the feasibility of PET imaging of prostate cancer with FDHT and suggest that tumor uptake of FDHT is a receptor-mediated process. Positive PET studies were associated with higher PSA levels and thus, presumably, with greater tumor burden.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 350
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Androgen receptors in prostate cancer
    Bentel, JM
    Tilley, WD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1996, 151 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [2] Bonasera TA, 1996, J NUCL MED, V37, P1009
  • [3] Contribution of the androgen receptor to prostate cancer predisposition and progression
    Buchanan, G
    Irvine, RA
    Coetzee, GA
    Tilley, WD
    [J]. CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2001, 20 (3-4) : 207 - 223
  • [4] Culig Z, 1998, PROSTATE, V35, P63, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19980401)35:1<63::AID-PROS9>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-I
  • [6] DEHDASHTI F, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P1766
  • [7] Positron emission tomographic assessment of "metabolic flare" to predict response of metastatic breast cancer to antiestrogen therapy
    Dehdashti, F
    Flanagan, FL
    Mortimer, JE
    Katzenellenbogen, JA
    Welch, MJ
    Siegel, BA
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 26 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [8] DEHDASHTI F, 1991, J NUCL MED, V32, P1532
  • [9] Huggins C, 1941, CANCER RES, V1, P293
  • [10] Pattern of somatic androgen receptor gene mutations in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer
    Hyytinen, ER
    Haapala, K
    Thompson, J
    Lappalainen, K
    Roiha, M
    Rantala, I
    Helin, HJ
    Jänne, IA
    Vihinen, M
    Palvimo, JJ
    Koivisto, PA
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2002, 82 (11) : 1591 - 1598