Interpretable Machine Learning to Improve Supply Chain Resilience, An Industry 4.0 Recipe

被引:3
|
作者
Heydarbakian, Sadeq [1 ]
Spehri, Mehran [1 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Tehran, Iran
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2022年 / 55卷 / 10期
关键词
supply chain resilience; resilience capacities; resilient supplier selection; machine learning; industry; 4.0;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.160
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The growth of disruption risks, that is, risks with very low probability of occurrence and very high adverse impacts (e.g., pandemics, earthquakes, etc.), across the global supply chains, has increased over the past decades. In Industry 4.0 environment, the increasing applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) throughout supply chain practices has led to the emergence of faster and more reliable decision-making methods when large volumes of data challenge the traditional methods. While applying machine learning (ML) techniques is well-documented in the supply chain risk literature, few studies focus on the interpretability of the outcomes achieved by ML. The present study aims to take a step towards fulfilling this gap by using machine learning algorithms on real-world data from an automotive supply chain In so doing, the performance data of 10 suppliers over two consecutive years were used. A clustering algorithm was first used to generate the labels based on the concept of resilience capacities. Then, since the interpretability of the results were a priority, two interpretable ML algorithms, Naive Bayes and decision tree, were chosen to classify the suppliers based on their performance with respect to each capacity. The results showed that for interpretable algorithms, decision tree could be potentially a better performing algorithm, yet Naive Bayes could provide more flexibility and insights through nomograms. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors.
引用
收藏
页码:2834 / 2839
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Supply chain resilience in the construction industry: a bibliometric review on operations management practices from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0
    Bello, Jummai Okikiola
    Stephen, Seyi
    Adetoro, Pelumi
    Mogaji, Iseoluwa Joanna
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [22] Does Industry 4.0 improve productivity? Evidence from the Italian automotive supply chain
    Calabrese, Giuseppe Giulio
    Falavigna, Greta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 22 (04) : 506 - 526
  • [23] Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance
    Fatorachian, Hajar
    Kazemi, Hadi
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2021, 32 (01) : 63 - 81
  • [24] Education supply chain in the era of Industry 4.0
    Li, Ling
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2020, 37 (04) : 579 - 592
  • [25] Integration of Lean Supply Chain and Industry 4.0
    Rossini, Matteo
    Ahmadi, Alireza
    Staudacher, Alberto Portioli
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY 4.0 AND SMART MANUFACTURING, ISM 2023, 2024, 232 : 1673 - 1682
  • [26] Industry 4.0: a supply chain innovation perspective
    Hahn, Gerd J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (05) : 1425 - 1441
  • [27] Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance
    Fatorachian, Hajar
    Kazemi, Hadi
    Production Planning and Control, 2021, 32 (01): : 63 - 81
  • [28] Industry 4.0 & Internet of Things in Supply Chain
    Galvez Lopez, Hector A.
    Perez Cisneros, Marco A.
    CLIHC'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH LATIN AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2015,
  • [29] Digital supply chain model in Industry 4.0
    Lizette Garay-Rondero, Claudia
    Luis Martinez-Flores, Jose
    Smith, Neale R.
    Caballero Morales, Santiago Omar
    Aldrette-Malacara, Alejandra
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 31 (05) : 887 - 933
  • [30] Industry 4.0 digital transformation and opportunities for supply chain resilience: a comprehensive review and a strategic roadmap
    Ghobakhloo, Morteza
    Iranmanesh, Mohammad
    Foroughi, Behzad
    Tseng, Ming-Lang
    Nikbin, Davoud
    Khanfar, Ahmad A. A.
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2025, 36 (01) : 61 - 91