GENE EDITING CLINICAL TRIALS COULD SLIP THROUGH AUSTRALIAN REGULATORY CRACKS

被引:0
|
作者
Eckstein, Lisa [1 ]
Nicol, Dianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Law & Genet, Hobart, Tas, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
gene editing; CRISPR; gene technology regulation; therapeutic goods administration; human research ethics committees; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In this column we explore the regulatory environment within which clinical trials involving new genome editing techniques are undertaken. Ostensibly, there is regulatory congestion in this area, with overlapping obligations through the national scheme for regulating gene technology, the national scheme for regulating the supply of therapeutic goods, and the human research ethics system, predominantly administered at the institutional level. In practice, however, the oversight of gene editing clinical trials is left almost entirely to human research ethics committees. Given the uncertain risks associated with such novel technologies, we conclude that it is opportune to reconsider the rigour of current Australian processes for assessing clinical trials involving gene-editing technology.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 283
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条