Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT

被引:7
作者
Harst, Lorenz [1 ,2 ]
Wollschlaeger, Bastian [3 ]
Birnstein, Jule [4 ]
Fuchs, Tina [3 ]
Timpel, Patrick [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Healthcare, Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Chair Tech Informat Syst, Dresden, Germany
[4] Zittau Gorlitz Univ Appl Sci, Zittau, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Dresden, Prevent & Care Diabet, Dept Med 3, Univ Hosp, Dresden, Germany
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE | 2021年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
Healthcare IT; user-centred design; implementation; evaluation; acceptance; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; IMPLEMENTATION; TELEHEALTH; FRAMEWORK; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.5334/ijic.5529
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The increasing availability of healthcare IT has the potential to improve the integration of health services. Existing projects developing healthcare IT mostly disregard the potential and importance of incorporating user feedback and proper evaluation measures to gain user feedback throughout the development process. We therefore provide methodological guidance for evaluation in a stepwise user-centred design process. Methods: Based on a literature review we propose adequate methods for data collection in each phase of participatory and user-centred healthcare IT development. In order to provide an orientation within the plethora of development processes used in practice, we consolidate a generic blueprint process from the literature review. The applicability of our methodological guidance is shown in three diverse use cases from the field of integrated care. Results: From 14 literature items, we identified common evaluation methods including, among others, interviews, focus groups, and surveys. These methods can be associated to six typical development phases that could be derived from research: State of the Art Research, Requirement Analysis, Conceptual Prototype, Preliminary Prototype, Full Prototype, Full Application. The use cases demonstrate the value of qualitative methods and mixed methods designs. Discussion: Our methodological guidance has proven applicable for designing healthcare IT solutions from scratch - both for patient and professional settings - and to develop a platform for combining existing component-based solutions. In integrated care settings, where a wide range of stakeholders with multiple needs exist, we thus provide methodological guidance on how to involve users in the development process. Conclusion: Our stepwise methodological guidance helps to design and properly evaluate healthcare IT solutions, which meet the user needs and requirements, for integrated care settings.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Agnisarman Sruthy, 2017, JMIR Hum Factors, V4, pe11, DOI 10.2196/humanfactors.7293
  • [2] Discharge from hospital - a national survey of transition to out-patient care
    Ahsberg, Elizabeth
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2019, 33 (02) : 329 - 335
  • [3] American Diabetes Association, 2016, Clin Diabetes, V34, P3, DOI 10.2337/diaclin.34.1.3
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, USER CTR DESIGN BASI
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, 92412102019EN ISO EU
  • [7] User-centered methods for designing patient-centric self-help tools
    Arsand, Eirik
    Demiris, George
    [J]. INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE, 2008, 33 (03) : 158 - 169
  • [8] Case Management Directors How to Manage in a Transition-Focused World: Part 1
    Bankston-White, Cheri
    Birmingham, Jackie
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 20 (02) : 63 - 78
  • [9] Bekiaris A, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6767, P131, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21666-4_15
  • [10] BOEHM BW, 1988, COMPUTER, V21, P61, DOI 10.1145/12944.12948