The effects of the environmental protection tax law on heavily polluting firms in China

被引:12
|
作者
Wen, Huwei [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Weifeng [2 ]
Guo, Quanen [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Cent China Econ & Social Dev, Res Ctr, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Dept Econ, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, Sch Tourism, Dept Tourism Management, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 12期
关键词
DISTORTIONS; INFORMATION; INVESTMENT; TAXATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0261342
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In 2016, China implemented an environmental protection tax (EPTL2016) to promote the transformation and upgrading of heavily polluting industries through tax leverage. Using panel data of China's listed companies, this study assesses the treatment effects of the EPTL2016 on the transformation and upgrading of heavily polluting firms by incorporating the intermediary role of the financial market. The empirical findings show that the EPTL2016 significantly reduced the innovation investment and productivity of heavily polluting firms but had no significant effect on fixed-asset investment. Additionally, EPTL2016 reduced the supply of bank loans to heavily polluting firms and increased the value of growth options for private enterprises and the efficiency of the supply of long-term loans to heavily polluting firms. Although the environmental policy of EPTL2016 benefits the transformation and upgrading of heavily polluting industries in many aspects, it generally hinders the industrial upgrading because of the reduction of bank loans.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Green tax system and corporate carbon emissions - a quasi-natural experiment based on the environmental protection tax law
    Xu, Wei
    Li, Mingzhu
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [22] The impact of tax reform on firms' digitalization in China
    Chen, Zhongfei
    Xiao, Yu
    Jiang, Kangqi
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 187
  • [23] Transboundary pollution in China: a study of polluting firms' location choices in Hebei province
    Duvivier, Chloe
    Xiong, Hang
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2013, 18 (04) : 459 - 483
  • [24] DOES MEDIA ATTENTION AFFECT FIRMS' ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EFFORTS? EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Kong, Gaowen
    Kong, Dongmin
    Wang, Maobin
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 65 (03) : 577 - 600
  • [25] Environmental protection tax policy and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China
    Wang, Shanyong
    Xu, Baolong
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 96
  • [26] Environmental violations and financial distress risk: Evidence from Chinese listed heavily polluting companies
    Xing, Kai
    Yang, Fang
    Liu, Ping
    Wang, Jue
    Wu, Junchuan
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2025, 89
  • [27] Environmental protection fee-to-tax and enterprise investment efficiency: Evidence from China
    Xie, Linlin
    Zuo, Shiyue
    Xie, Ziqin
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2023, 66
  • [28] Influence of Financialization of Heavily Polluting Enterprises on Technological Innovation under the Background of Environmental Pollution Control
    Zhou, Yingying
    Du, Yuehan
    Lei, Fengyi
    Su, Ziru
    Feng, Yifei
    Li, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (24)
  • [29] The environmental benefit of tax enforcement: evidence from China
    Luo, Yu
    Zhang, Ming-ang
    Zhang, Sihan
    CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 17 (01) : 78 - 96
  • [30] Stringent environmental regulation and capital structure: The effect of NEPL on deleveraging the high polluting firms
    Yang, Jingyi
    Shi, Daqian
    Yang, Wenbo
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 79 : 643 - 656