Identifying and Explaining Public Preferences for Renewable Energy Sources in Qatar

被引:2
作者
Nassar, Ahmed K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Univ, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Int Affairs, Policy Planning & Dev Program, POB 2713, Doha, Qatar
关键词
preferences; renewable energy; non-renewable energy; knowledge; questionnaire; Qatar; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NUCLEAR-POWER; GEOTHERMAL-ENERGY; PERCEPTION; ATTITUDES; STUDENTS; IMPACTS; OPINION;
D O I
10.3390/su142113835
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As a major natural gas and oil producer, Qatar has made significant strides towards its energy transition. This paper uses a survey research design with statistical tests to investigate citizens' preferences for a wide range of energy resources. In this study, participants were asked to prioritize energy sources based on their environmental impact, price, benefits to Qatar's economy, support of energy security, and ability to create jobs. The results showed that approximately two-thirds of the sample (n = 354) preferred renewable energy sources, particularly solar, which ranks first. Renewable energy sources were more likely to be favored by the group with greater knowledge of energy sources than those with limited knowledge, except for solar energy, which was preferred by both groups. Additionally, both natural gas and wind rank second in terms of preference, followed by hydropower. In contrast, nuclear power was not ranked, indicating a strong opposition to this type of energy. The study provides an evidence-based example of the tendency of citizens in a hydrocarbon-rich country to prefer renewable energy sources and natural gas. The energy policymakers need to collaborate with local communities so that citizens can participate in important future energy discussions to develop a personal connection to climate solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 86 条
[61]  
Planning and Statistics Authority Qatar Voluntary National Review, 2021, REPORT IMPLEMENTATIO
[62]   Energy Policies of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries-possibilities and limitations of ecological modernization in rentier states [J].
Reiche, Danyel .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (05) :2395-2403
[63]  
Reuters EU Parliament, 2022, BACKS LAB GAS NUCL I
[64]   Perceived subjective versus objective knowledge: Consumer valuation of genetically modified certification on food producing plants [J].
Rihn, Alicia ;
Khachatryan, Hayk ;
Wei, Xuan .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08)
[65]   Perception of EU citizens on engineered biocatalytic solar fuels [J].
Roesch, Christine ;
Villarreal, Jessica Varela .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 149
[66]   A critical review on environmental impacts of renewable energy systems and mitigation strategies: Wind, hydro, biomass and geothermal [J].
Sayed, Enas Taha ;
Wilberforce, Tabbi ;
Elsaid, Khaled ;
Rabaia, Malek Kamal Hussien ;
Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali ;
Chae, Kyu-Jung ;
Olabi, A. G. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 766
[67]  
Schmitt R.., 2015, BRIDGING ATTITUDE PR
[68]   PREFERENCES VS. DESIRES: DEBATING THE FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURE OF CONATIVE STATES [J].
Schulz, Armin W. .
ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 31 (02) :239-257
[69]   Public acceptance of renewable energies and energy autonomy: A comparative study in the French, German and Swiss Upper Rhine region [J].
Schumacher, K. ;
Krones, F. ;
McKenna, R. ;
Schultmann, F. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 126 :315-332
[70]   Efficient method for paired comparison [J].
Silverstein, DA ;
Farrell, JE .
JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING, 2001, 10 (02) :394-398