Modern Monetary Theory and the Changing Role of Tax in Society

被引:19
作者
Baker, Andrew [1 ]
Murphy, Richard [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Polit & Int Relat, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] City Univ London, Dept Int Polit, London, England
[3] Tax Res UK, London, England
关键词
Tax; modern monetary theory; social policy; modern tax theory; money; debt; government; WELFARE; AUSTERITY; STATE;
D O I
10.1017/S1474746420000056
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Tax is traditionally viewed as the main funding mechanism for government spending. Consequently, social policy is often seen as something determined and constrained by tax revenue. Modern Monetary Theory ('MMT') presents a reversal of the tax-spend cycle, by identifying a spend-tax cycle. Using the UK as an example, we highlight that one of MMT's most important, but under-explored, contributions is its potential to re-frame the role of tax from both a macroeconomic and social policy perspective. We use insights on the money removal, or cancellation function of taxes, derived from MMT, to demonstrate how this also creates possibilities for using tax to achieve social objectives such as mitigating income and wealth inequality, increasing access to housing, or funding a Green New Deal. For social policy researchers the challenge arising is to use these insights to re-engineer tax systems and redesign social tax expenditures (STEs) for creative social policy purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 469
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Ahmed K., 2016, BBC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1974, PATHWAYS TAX REFORM
[3]  
[Anonymous], SOC POL ADM
[4]  
[Anonymous], NAT PLAN UK AUST AG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Statistical Bulletin
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1986, REFUGES MULTICULTURA, V2, P1
[7]   Corporations, society, and the state: A defense of the corporate tax [J].
Avi-Yonah, RS .
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 2004, 90 (05) :1193-1255
[9]  
Baker A., 2019, TAX SPILLOVER ASSESS
[10]   The Political Economy of 'Tax Spillover': A New Multilateral Framework [J].
Baker, Andrew ;
Murphy, Richard .
GLOBAL POLICY, 2019, 10 (02) :178-192