Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems

被引:145
作者
Douthwaite, B [1 ]
Kuby, T
van de Fliert, E
Schulz, S
机构
[1] CIAT, Cali, Colombia
[2] Deutsch Gesell Tech Zusammanarbeit GmbH, GTZ, Eschborn, Germany
[3] FAO, Reg Vegetable Program, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Swiss Organ Dev & Cooperat Intercooperat, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
impact assessment; participatory approaches; program theory; integrated natural resource management; integrated pest management; striga; Nigeria; Indonesia;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00128-8
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Agricultural development is fundamentally a social process in which people construct solutions to their problems, often by modifying both new technologies and their own production systems to take advantage of new opportunities offered by the technologies. Hence, agricultural change is an immensely complex process, with a high degree of non-linearity. However, current 'best practice' economic evaluation methods commonly used in the CGIAR system ignore complexity. In this paper we develop a two-stage monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment approach called impact pathway evaluation. This approach is based on program-theory evaluation from the field of evaluation, and the experience of the German development organization GTZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH). In the first stage of this approach, a research project develops an impact pathway for itself. which is an explicit theory or model of how the project sees itself achieving impact. The project then uses the impact pathway to guide project management in complex environments. The impact pathway may evolve, based on learning over time. The second stage is an ex post impact assessment sometime after the project has finished, in which the project's wider benefits are independently assessed. The evaluator seeks to establish plausible links between the project outputs and developmental changes, such as poverty alleviation. We illustrate the usefulness of impact pathway evaluation through examples from Nigeria and Indonesia. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 265
页数:23
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Alston J. M., 1995, SCI SCARCITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], NEW DIRECTIONS EVALU
[3]  
Bijker WE., 1987, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
[4]  
Braun A. R, 1999, FARMER FIELD SCH INT
[5]  
Collinson M, 2000, HISTORY OF FARMING SYSTEMS RESEARCH, P1, DOI 10.1079/9780851994055.0001
[6]   Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption [J].
Douthwaite, B ;
Keatinge, JDH ;
Park, JR .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (05) :819-836
[7]  
Douthwaite B., 2002, ENABLING INNOVATION
[8]  
Douthwaite B., 2001, CONSERV ECOL, V5, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-00335-050213
[9]  
FUNNEL P, 2000, NEW DIRECTIONS EVALU, V87
[10]  
*GAO, 1987, 9 GAO PROGR EV METH