Nurses' perceptions of risks for occupational hazards in patient seclusion and restraint practices in psychiatric inpatient care: A focus group study

被引:14
作者
Varpula, Jaakko [1 ]
Valimaki, Maritta [1 ,2 ]
Lantta, Tella [1 ]
Berg, Johanna [3 ]
Lahti, Mari [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku 20014, Finland
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Nursing, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Turku Univ Appl Sci, Turku, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
occupational hazards; psychiatric care; risks; safety; seclusion; QUALITATIVE CONTENT-ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL INTERVENTIONS; MECHANICAL RESTRAINT; SAFETY CLIMATE; USER VIOLENCE; STAFF; EXPERIENCES; CONTAINMENT; INTERVIEWS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1111/inm.12705
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Seclusion and restraint are regularly used to manage patient aggression events in psychiatric inpatient care, despite occupational safety concerns. There is currently a lack of information on how nurses perceive the use of patient seclusion and restraint as a risk for occupational safety. The aim of this study is to describe the risks for occupational hazards in patient seclusion and mechanical restraint practices as well as ideas for improvement identified by nurses. A qualitative descriptive design was adopted, using focus groups comprising nurses (N = 32) working in psychiatric inpatient care. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis, and the results were reported using the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ). Four themes of risk for occupational hazards were identified: patient-induced, staff-induced, organization-induced, and environment-induced risks. One significant finding was that nurses described that their actions can strongly contribute to occupational hazards during seclusion and mechanical restraint practices. The nurses gave various ideas for how occupational safety could be improved during seclusion and mechanical restraint events, ideas involving staff, the organization, and environmental enhancements.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 715
页数:13
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [11] Reliability assessments in qualitative health promotion research
    Cook, Kay E.
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 27 (01) : 90 - 101
  • [12] Cooper Dominic, 2005, Ther Clin Risk Manag, V1, P321
  • [13] *COUNC EUR STEER C, 2000, PROT HUM RIGHTS DIGN
  • [14] Council of Europe, 2019, PARL ASS RES 2291 20
  • [15] Compassionate containment? Balancing technical safety and therapy in the design of psychiatric wards
    Curtis, Sarah
    Gesler, Wilbert
    Wood, Victoria
    Spencer, Ian
    Mason, James
    Close, Helen
    Reilly, Joseph
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 97 : 201 - 209
  • [16] An integrative review exploring the physical and psychological harm inherent in using restraint in mental health inpatient settings
    Cusack, Pauline
    Cusack, Frank Patrick
    McAndrew, Sue
    McKeown, Mick
    Duxbury, Joy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2018, 27 (03) : 1162 - 1176
  • [17] 'The big buzz': a qualitative study of how safe care is perceived, understood and improved in general practice
    de Wet, Carl
    Bowie, Paul
    O'Donnell, Catherine
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
  • [18] Implicit as Compared With Explicit Safety Procedures: The Experiences of Israeli Nurses
    Drach-Zahavy, Anat
    Somech, Anit
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2010, 20 (10) : 1406 - 1417
  • [19] Staff experiences and understandings of the REsTRAIN Yourself initiative to minimize the use of physical restraint on mental health wards
    Duxbury, Joy
    Thomson, Gill
    Scholes, Amy
    Jones, Fiona
    Baker, John
    Downe, Soo
    Greenwood, Paul
    Price, Owen
    Whittington, Richard
    McKeown, Mick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2019, 28 (04) : 845 - 856
  • [20] The qualitative content analysis process
    Elo, Satu
    Kyngaes, Helvi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 107 - 115