Nurses' perceptions of risks for occupational hazards in patient seclusion and restraint practices in psychiatric inpatient care: A focus group study

被引:14
作者
Varpula, Jaakko [1 ]
Valimaki, Maritta [1 ,2 ]
Lantta, Tella [1 ]
Berg, Johanna [3 ]
Lahti, Mari [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku 20014, Finland
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Nursing, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Turku Univ Appl Sci, Turku, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
occupational hazards; psychiatric care; risks; safety; seclusion; QUALITATIVE CONTENT-ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL INTERVENTIONS; MECHANICAL RESTRAINT; SAFETY CLIMATE; USER VIOLENCE; STAFF; EXPERIENCES; CONTAINMENT; INTERVIEWS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1111/inm.12705
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Seclusion and restraint are regularly used to manage patient aggression events in psychiatric inpatient care, despite occupational safety concerns. There is currently a lack of information on how nurses perceive the use of patient seclusion and restraint as a risk for occupational safety. The aim of this study is to describe the risks for occupational hazards in patient seclusion and mechanical restraint practices as well as ideas for improvement identified by nurses. A qualitative descriptive design was adopted, using focus groups comprising nurses (N = 32) working in psychiatric inpatient care. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis, and the results were reported using the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ). Four themes of risk for occupational hazards were identified: patient-induced, staff-induced, organization-induced, and environment-induced risks. One significant finding was that nurses described that their actions can strongly contribute to occupational hazards during seclusion and mechanical restraint practices. The nurses gave various ideas for how occupational safety could be improved during seclusion and mechanical restraint events, ideas involving staff, the organization, and environmental enhancements.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 715
页数:13
相关论文
共 84 条
[11]  
Cooper Dominic, 2005, Ther Clin Risk Manag, V1, P321
[12]  
*COUNC EUR STEER C, 2000, PROT HUM RIGHTS DIGN
[13]  
Council of Europe, 2019, PARL ASS RES 2291 20
[14]   Compassionate containment? Balancing technical safety and therapy in the design of psychiatric wards [J].
Curtis, Sarah ;
Gesler, Wilbert ;
Wood, Victoria ;
Spencer, Ian ;
Mason, James ;
Close, Helen ;
Reilly, Joseph .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 97 :201-209
[15]   An integrative review exploring the physical and psychological harm inherent in using restraint in mental health inpatient settings [J].
Cusack, Pauline ;
Cusack, Frank Patrick ;
McAndrew, Sue ;
McKeown, Mick ;
Duxbury, Joy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2018, 27 (03) :1162-1176
[16]   'The big buzz': a qualitative study of how safe care is perceived, understood and improved in general practice [J].
de Wet, Carl ;
Bowie, Paul ;
O'Donnell, Catherine .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
[17]   Implicit as Compared With Explicit Safety Procedures: The Experiences of Israeli Nurses [J].
Drach-Zahavy, Anat ;
Somech, Anit .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2010, 20 (10) :1406-1417
[18]   Staff experiences and understandings of the REsTRAIN Yourself initiative to minimize the use of physical restraint on mental health wards [J].
Duxbury, Joy ;
Thomson, Gill ;
Scholes, Amy ;
Jones, Fiona ;
Baker, John ;
Downe, Soo ;
Greenwood, Paul ;
Price, Owen ;
Whittington, Richard ;
McKeown, Mick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2019, 28 (04) :845-856
[19]  
Ensio A., 2019, STRENGTHENING HLTH S, V52
[20]   Occupational risks and illness among mental health workers [J].
Fernandes, Marcia Astres ;
Palucci Marziale, Maria Helena .
ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2014, 27 (06) :539-547