Techno-economic comparative analysis of Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles with and without CO2 capture

被引:71
作者
Zang, Guiyan [1 ]
Jia, Junxi [2 ]
Tejasvi, Sharma [1 ]
Ratner, Albert [1 ]
Lora, Electo Silva [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, 3131 Seamans Ctr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Harbin Engn Univ, Coll Power & Energy Engn, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Fed Itajuba, Dept Mech Engn, BR-37500903 Itajuba, MG, Brazil
关键词
BIGCC; Economic analysis; Sensitivity analysis; CO2 emission price; Biomass price; FIRED POWER-PLANT; NATURAL-GAS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; METHANOL PRODUCTION; FIRING BIOMASS; COAL-BIOMASS; SYSTEM; GENERATION; CONFIGURATIONS; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC) power system is a potential application of biomass gasification technology to control CO2 emissions from power generation processes. Nevertheless, there is no study of BIGCC systems that provides detailed techno-economic comparative among its different technological alternatives. This study provides the techno-economic comparative analysis of eight BIGCC system designs that include the technology options of the biomass gasification, the power generation, and the CO2 emission control. Results show that the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) of these systems is ranged from 13.1 cent/kWh to 25.9 cent/kWh. For current designs, the Selexol CO2 removal technology is more economical than the MEA CO2 capture process. Furthermore, when the biomass price is lower than 10 $/ton, the air gasification BIGCC systems can compete with the current electricity generation technology, whereas when the CO2 emission price is higher than 90 $/ton, the additional CO2 Capture and Storage technology has the potential to reduce the LCOE of BIGCC systems. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis estimates the impacts of other key economic parameters on the LCOE and Monte Carlo method is used to show the uncertainty of simulation.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 84
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessments of sixty scenarios for co-firing biomass with coal and natural gas [J].
Agbor, Ezinwa ;
Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire ;
Zhang, Xiaolei ;
Kumar, Amit .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 169 :433-449
[2]   Externally fired gas turbine technology: A review [J].
Al-attab, K. A. ;
Zainal, Z. A. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :474-487
[3]   Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review [J].
Alauddin, Zainal Alimuddin Bin Zainal ;
Lahijani, Pooya ;
Mohammadi, Maedeh ;
Mohamed, Abdul Rahman .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (09) :2852-2862
[4]   Comparative potential of natural gas, coal and biomass fired power plant with post - combustion CO2 capture and compression [J].
Ali, Usman ;
Font-Palma, Carolina ;
Akram, Muhammad ;
Agbonghae, Elvis O. ;
Ingham, Derek B. ;
Pourkashanian, Mohamed .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2017, 63 :184-193
[5]   Oxygen Specific Power Consumption Comparison for Air Separation Units [J].
Alsultanny, Yas A. ;
Al-Shammari, Nayef N. .
ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2014, 18 (02) :67-80
[6]   Techno-economic analysis of ammonia production via integrated biomass gasification [J].
Andersson, Jim ;
Lundgren, Joakim .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 130 :484-490
[7]   Methanol production via pressurized entrained flow biomass gasification - Techno-economic comparison of integrated vs. stand-alone production [J].
Andersson, Jim ;
Lundgren, Joakim ;
Marklund, Magnus .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 64 :256-268
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, REV TECHNOLOGIES GAS
[9]   Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review [J].
Asadullah, Mohammad .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 40 :118-132
[10]   Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review [J].
Asadullah, Mohammad .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 :201-215