Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG

被引:231
|
作者
van den Broek, SP [1 ]
Reinders, F [1 ]
Donderwinkel, M [1 ]
Peters, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Low Temp Div, Fac Appl Phys, Biomagnet Ctr, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1998年 / 106卷 / 06期
关键词
EEG; MEG; volume conduction; holes; ventricles; anisotropy;
D O I
10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00147-8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Volume conductor models that are commonly used to describe the EEG and MEG neglect holes in the skull, lesions, the ventricles, and anisotropic conductivity of the skull. To determine the influence of these features, simulations were carried out using the finite element method. The simulations showed that a hole in the skull will have a large effect on the EEG, and as one of the consequences localisation errors up to 15 mm may occur. The effect on the MEG is negligible. The presence of a lesion may cause the shape and magnitude of the EEG and MEG to change. Hence, a lesion has to be taken into account, if the active neurones are close to it. Moreover, a localisation procedure may fail if the lesion is not included in the volume conductor model. Inclusion of the ventricles in the volume conductor model is necessary only if sources are in their vicinity or if their sizes are unusually large. Anisotropic conductivity of the skull has a smearing effect on the EEG but does not influence the MEG. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 534
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence
    Winter, William R.
    Nunez, Paul L.
    Ding, Jian
    Srinivasan, Ramesh
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (21) : 3946 - 3957
  • [2] Quantification of the effects of volume conduction on the EEG/MEG connectivity estimates: an index of sensitivity to brain interactions
    Khadem, Ali
    Hossein-Zadeh, Gholam-Ali
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2014, 35 (10) : 2149 - 2164
  • [3] A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG
    Vorwerk, Johannes
    Cho, Jae-Hyun
    Rampp, Stefan
    Hamer, Hajo
    Knoesche, Thomas R.
    Wolters, Carsten H.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 100 : 590 - 607
  • [4] THE FUTURE OF THE EEG AND MEG
    WIKSWO, JP
    GEVINS, A
    WILLIAMSON, SJ
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 87 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [5] MEG and EEG in epilepsy
    Barkley, GL
    Baumgartner, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (03) : 163 - 178
  • [6] How to assess the accuracy of volume conduction models? A validation study with stereotactic EEG data
    Piastra, Maria Carla
    Oostenveld, Robert
    Homolle, Simon
    Han, Biao
    Chen, Qi
    Oostendorp, Thom
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [7] Dipole models for the EEG and MEG
    Schimpf, PH
    Ramon, C
    Haueisen, J
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 49 (05) : 409 - 418
  • [8] MEG, EEG AND ECOG - DISCUSSION
    BAUMGARTNER, C
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 89 : 91 - 92
  • [9] Functional localization of brain sources using EEG and/or MEG data: volume conductor and source models
    da Silva, FL
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 22 (10) : 1533 - 1538
  • [10] Validating EEG, MEG and Combined MEG and EEG Beamforming for an Estimation of the Epileptogenic Zone in Focal Cortical Dysplasia
    Neugebauer, Frank
    Antonakakis, Marios
    Unnwongse, Kanjana
    Parpaley, Yaroslav
    Wellmer, Joerg
    Rampp, Stefan
    Wolters, Carsten H.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (01)