Market diversification and social benefits: Motivations of farmers participating in farm to school programs

被引:72
作者
Izumi, Betty T. [1 ]
Wright, D. Wynne [2 ]
Hamm, Michael W. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Sch Community Hlth, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Community Agr Recreat & Resource Studies, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Food Sci & Nutr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Alternative agrifood networks; Embeddedness; Farm to school; Public procurement; Local food; Farmers; TO-SCHOOL; FOOD NETWORKS; EMBEDDEDNESS; SYSTEMS; STRATEGIES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.02.002
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Activists and academics are increasingly advocating for public procurement of locally grown food as a key market opportunity for farmers. In the United States, linking farmers directly with school cafeterias through farm to school programs are among the efforts that advocates say can provide a significant boost to rural economies. Through an empirical analysis of farmers' perspectives of farm to school programs, this paper explores why farmers participate in these efforts. The data presented are part of a larger study exploring the opportunities and challenges of farm to school programs located in the United States from the perspectives of farmers, food service professionals, and food distributors. Our findings suggest that farmers sold their products to schools for two primary reasons: to diversify their marketing strategies and to contribute to social benefits through direct action. The concepts of embeddedness, marketness, and economic instrumentalism provide a framework for understanding their participation in farm to school programs. Our findings also provide insight into the kind of support necessary to sustain long-term connections between farmers and school food service professionals. As advocates seek to institutionalize public procurement of locally grown foods, it is critical that farmers' needs and motivations are considered. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 382
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: the tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California [J].
Allen, P ;
FitzSimmons, M ;
Goodman, M ;
Warner, K .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2003, 19 (01) :61-75
[2]   From "old school" to "farm-to-school": Neoliberalization from the ground up [J].
Allen, Patricia ;
Guthman, Julie .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2006, 23 (04) :401-415
[3]  
ALTIERI M, 2009, MONTHLY REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Dietary guidelines for Americans
[5]  
Azuma A.M., 2001, Healthy farms, healthy kids: Evaluating the barriers and opportunities for farm-to-school programs
[6]  
BERKENKAMP J, 2006, MINNESOTA GROWN FRUI
[7]  
Block F., 1990, POSTINDUSTRIAL POSSI
[8]  
Block Fred., 2001, GREAT TRANSFORMATION
[9]  
*COMM FOOD SEC COA, FARM SCH LEG STAT ST
[10]  
FOX MK, 2001, SCH NUTR DIET ASS ST, V2