Effects of membrane fouling on solute rejection during membrane filtration of activated sludge

被引:164
|
作者
Chang, IS [1 ]
Bag, SO
Lee, CH
机构
[1] Hoseo Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Chung Nam 336795, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Seoul 151742, South Korea
关键词
activated sludge; fouling; membrane bioreactor (MBR); membrane; ultrafiltration;
D O I
10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00284-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To assess the relationship between solute rejection and membrane fouling in a MBR system, membrane filtrations of activated sludge in different physiological states were carried out with ultrafiltration membranes. Regardless of the physiological states of the activated sludge (foaming, bulking, pin-point hoc, exponential growth. endogenous phase, normal state sludge), the hydrophobic membrane (PM30) always showed greater solute rejection than the hydrophilic membrane (YM30). To investigate the key factors affecting solute rejection, the cake layer resistances (R-c) and the fouling resistances (R-f) were measured. The R-c and R-f values for the PM30 were always higher than for the YM30 and the R-c prevailed over the R-f in all cases. The solutes rejection by the adsorption onto/into the membrane was relatively small. This suggests that the cake layer deposited on the membrane surfaces played an important role in the solute rejection, i.e. dominant solute removals were attributed to the adsorption and/or sieving onto the cakes. Consequently, the difference in solute rejection efficiency between hydrophilic and hydrophobic membranes was mainly due to the degree of sieving and/or adsorption onto the cakes deposited on the membrane, and partly due to adsorption into membrane pores and the surfaces. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 860
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Retention and Fouling during Nanoparticle Filtration: Implications for Membrane Purification of Biotherapeutics
    Liang-Kai Chu
    Wickramasinghe, S. Ranil
    Qian, Xianghong
    Zydney, Andrew L.
    MEMBRANES, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [32] The activated sludge and microbial substances influences on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor: unstirred batch cell test
    Cho, JW
    Song, KG
    Ahn, KH
    DESALINATION, 2005, 183 (1-3) : 425 - 429
  • [33] Effects of filtration modes on membrane fouling behavior and treatment in submerged membrane bioreactor
    Maqbool, Tahir
    Khan, Sher Jamal
    Lee, Chung-Hak
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 172 : 391 - 395
  • [34] Influence of the properties and characteristics of sugar-beet pulp extract on its fouling and rejection behaviour during membrane filtration
    Hatziantoniou, D
    Howell, JA
    DESALINATION, 2002, 148 (1-3) : 67 - 72
  • [35] Characterization and control of membrane fouling during dewatering of activated sludge using a thin film composite forward osmosis membrane
    Nguyen Duc Viet
    Im, Sung-Ju
    Jang, Am
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2020, 396
  • [36] Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR): Characterisation of the sludge cake and its high filtration resistance
    Wang, Xiao-Mao
    Li, Xiao-Yan
    Huang, Xia
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 52 (03) : 439 - 445
  • [37] Solute-membrane fouling interactions during the ultrafiltration of black tea liquor
    Evans, P. J.
    Bird, M. R.
    FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING, 2006, 84 (C4) : 292 - 301
  • [38] Reversibility of fouling formed in activated sludge filtration
    Defrance, L
    Jaffrin, MY
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1999, 157 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [39] Sludge properties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (SAnMBRs)
    Lin, H. J.
    Xie, K.
    Mahendran, B.
    Bagley, D. M.
    Leung, K. T.
    Liss, S. N.
    Liao, B. Q.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (15) : 3827 - 3837
  • [40] Impact of ozonation and biological activated carbon filtration on ceramic membrane fouling
    Hamid, Khaled Ibn Abdul
    Sanciolo, Peter
    Gray, Stephen
    Duke, Mikel
    Muthukumaran, Shobha
    WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 126 : 308 - 318