Influence of Dental Implant Diameter and Bone Quality on the Biomechanics of Single-Crown Restoration. A Finite Element Analysis

被引:26
作者
Anitua, Eduardo [1 ]
Saez de Ibarra, Naiara Larrazabal [1 ]
Morales Martin, Inigo [1 ]
Saracho Rotaeche, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] BTI Biotechnol Inst, Jacinto Quincoces 39, Vitoria 01007, Spain
关键词
biomechanics; finite element analysis; single-unit implant; short dental implant; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; 6-MM IMPLANTS; IMPACT; LENGTH; RATIO; GEOMETRY; SYSTEMS; MM;
D O I
10.3390/dj9090103
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Success of an implant-supported prosthesis is highly dependent on implant diameter and bone quality. The objective of this study is to assess these two variables under axial or 30 degrees angulated loading. Methods: The study was conducted using finite element model simulations of dental implants with an unchanging length of 6.5 mm and varying diameters of o3.3; o3.5; o3.75; o4, o4.25 and o4.75 mm. The implants were placed in an axial position and a 2 mm high straight transepithelial (intermediate abutment) was used to perform a single tooth restoration. Four bone quality scenarios, Type IV, III, II or 0-I bone, were simulated from a simplified model of the mandible. A 200N load was applied both axially and at a 30 degrees angle to the occlusal surface of the prosthesis, which was 11 mm above the implant platform, and the equivalent Von Mises stress in the bone was analyzed. Results: The maximum stress value was obtained for the o3.3 implant in Type IV bone (235 MPa), while the lowest value was obtained for the o4.75 implant and in Type 0-I bone (41 MPa). Regardless of the implant diameter, an improvement in bone quality produced a reduction in bone stress. The same effect was observed as the implant diameter was increased, being this effect even more pronounced. Conclusions: Implant diameter has an important effect on bone stress, with a reduction in stress as the implant diameter increases.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Akça K, 2001, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V16, P722
[2]  
Anitua E., 2017, Short and Extra-Short Implants, P57
[3]   Clinical Performance of Short Dental Implants Supporting Single Crown Restoration in the Molar-Premolar Region: Cement Versus Screw Retention [J].
Anitua, Eduardo ;
Hamdan Alkhraisat, Mohammad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (04) :969-976
[4]   Efficacy of biologically guided implant site preparation to obtain adequate primary implant stability [J].
Anitua, Eduardo ;
Alkhraisat, Mohammad Hamdan ;
Pinas, Laura ;
Orive, Gorka .
ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2015, 199 :9-15
[5]  
Anitua E, 2010, INT J PERIODONT REST, V30, P89
[6]   Influence of bone quality on the mechanical interaction between implant and bone: A finite element analysis [J].
Azcarate-Velazquez, Francisco ;
Castillo-Oyague, Raquel ;
Oliveros-Lopez, Luis-Guillermo ;
Torres-Lagares, Daniel ;
Martinez-Gonzalez, Alvaro-Jose ;
Perez-Velasco, Andrea ;
Lynch, Christopher D. ;
Gutierrez-Perez, Jose-Luis ;
Serrera-Figallo, Maria-Angeles .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2019, 88
[7]   THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLANT DIAMETER AND LENGTH ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS RELATED TO CRESTAL BONE GEOMETRY: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS [J].
Baggi, Luigi ;
Cappelloni, Ilaria ;
Di Girolamo, Michele ;
Maceri, Franco ;
Vairo, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 100 (06) :422-431
[8]  
Barewal RM, 2012, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V27, P945
[9]   Viability of Maxillary Single Crowns Supported by 4-mm Short Implants: A Finite Element Study [J].
Capatti, Rodrigo Souza ;
Barboza, Marcela Silva ;
da Gama Antunes, Alberto Nogueira ;
Oliveira, Dauro Douglas ;
Seraidarian, Paulo Isaias .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (03) :E41-E50
[10]   Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Short Implants with Different Treatment Approaches in the Atrophic Mandible [J].
Doganay, Ozge ;
Kilic, Erdem .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (04) :E69-E76