Socioeconomic Equity in the Receipt of In-Hospital Care and Outcomes in Australian Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: The CONCORDANCE Registry

被引:9
作者
Hyun, Karice [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Redfern, Julie [2 ]
Woodward, Mark [2 ,4 ]
D'Souza, Mario [5 ]
Shetty, Pratap [6 ]
Chew, Derek [7 ]
Kangaharan, Nadarajah [8 ]
Farshid, Ahmad [9 ]
Alford, Kevin [10 ]
Briffa, Tom [11 ]
Brieger, David [12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Concord Hosp, ANZAC Res Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Oxford, George Inst Global Hlth, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Oxford, England
[5] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Sydney Local Hlth Dist Clin Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Wollongong Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[7] Flinders Univ S Australia, Dept Cardiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[8] Alice Springs Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Alice Springs, NT, Australia
[9] Canberra Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[10] Port Macquarie Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
[11] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Perth, WA, Australia
[12] Univ Sydney, Concord Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Acute coronary syndrome; Socioeconomic status; In-Hospital care; Clinical events; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HEALTH-CARE; COVERAGE; SERVICE; DISEASE; MORTALITY; ACCESS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2017.08.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Socioeconomic status (SES) is a social determinant of both health and receipt of health care services, but its impact is under-studied in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to examine the influence of SES on in-hospital care, and clinical events for patients presenting with an ACS to public hospitals in Australia. Methods Data from 9064 ACS patient records were collected from 41 public hospitals nationwide from 2009 as part of the Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome Care (CONCORDANCE) registry. For this analysis, we divided the cohort into four socioeconomic groups (based on postcode of usual residence) and compared the in-hospital care provided and clinical outcomes before and after adjustment for both patient clinical characteristics and hospital clustering. Results Patients were divided into four SES groups (from the most to the least disadvantaged: 2042 (23%) vs. 2104 (23%) vs. 1994 (22%) vs. 2968 (32%)). Following adjustments for patient characteristics, there were no differences in the odds of receiving coronary angiogram, revascularisation, prescription of recommended medication, or referral to cardiac rehabilitation across the SES groups (p = 0.06, 0.69, 0.89 and 0.79, respectively). After adjustment for clinical characteristics, no associations were observed for in-hospital and cumulative death (p = 0.62 and p = 0.71, respectively). However, the most disadvantaged group were 37% more likely to have a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) than the least disadvantaged group (OR (95% CI): 137 (1.1, 1.71), p = 0.02) driven by incidence of in-hospital heart failure. Conclusions Although there may be gaps in the delivery of care, this delivery of care does not differ by patient's SES. It is an encouraging affirmation that all patients in Australian public hospitals receive equal in-hospital care, and the likelihood of death is comparable between the SES groups.
引用
收藏
页码:1398 / 1405
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Access Economics, 2009, EC COSTS HEART ATT C
  • [2] Socioeconomic Status and Stroke An Updated Review
    Addo, Juliet
    Ayerbe, Luis
    Mohan, Keerthi M.
    Crichton, Siobhan
    Sheldenkar, Anita
    Chen, Ruoling
    Wolfe, Charles D. A.
    McKevitt, Christopher
    [J]. STROKE, 2012, 43 (04) : 1186 - 1191
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, HLTH HOSP PRACT GREE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, CENSUS POPULATION HO
  • [5] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2011, CAT NO CVD
  • [6] Socioeconomic differentials in recurrent ischaemia and mortality after acute myocardial infarction
    Barakat, K
    Stevenson, S
    Wilkinson, P
    Suliman, A
    Ranjadayalan, K
    Timmis, AD
    [J]. HEART, 2001, 85 (04) : 390 - 394
  • [7] Socioeconomic disadvantage and acute coronary events - A spatiotemporal analysis
    Beard, John R.
    Earnest, Arul
    Morgan, Geoff
    Chan, Hsien
    Summerhayes, Richard
    Dunn, Therese M.
    Tomaska, Nola A.
    Ryan, Louise
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (03) : 485 - 492
  • [8] Socioeconomic status and chronic kidney disease at presentation to a renal service in the United Kingdom
    Bello, Aminu K.
    Peters, Jean
    Rigby, Jan
    Rahman, Alhussein A.
    El Nahas, Meguid
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 3 (05): : 1316 - 1323
  • [9] Should fee-for-service be for all guideline-advocated acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care? Observations from the Snapshot ACS study
    Briffa, Thomas G.
    Hammett, Christopher J.
    Cross, David B.
    Macisaac, Andrew I.
    Rankin, James M.
    Board, Neville
    Carr, Bridie
    Hyun, Karice K.
    French, John
    Brieger, David B.
    Chew, Derek P.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2015, 39 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [10] Variation in coronary angiography rates in Austratia: correlations with socio-dernograp health service and disease burden indices
    Chew, Derek P.
    MacIsaac, Andrew I.
    Lefkovits, Jeffrey
    Harper, Richard W.
    Slawomirski, Luke
    Braddock, David
    Horsfall, Matthew J.
    Buchan, Heather A.
    Ellis, Chris John
    Brieger, David B.
    Briffa, Tom G.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2016, 205 (03) : 114 - 120