Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy

被引:76
作者
Brizzolara, S
Pillai-Allen, A
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Honolulu, HI 96826 USA
[2] Straub Clin & Hosp, Honolulu, HI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00515-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To examine short- and long-term mesh-related complications in women undergoing abdominal sacral colpopexy with concurrent hysterectomy, compared with women with a prior hysterectomy undergoing sacral colpopexy alone. METHODS: Patient characteristics, hospital complications, postoperative clinical course, and long-term graft-related complications were reviewed for all women with genital prolapse who underwent abdominal sacral colopexy between 1996 and 1998. Women with concurrent hysterectomy were compared with women with vaginal prolapse after a prior hysterectomy. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients, 60 with concurrent hysterectomy and 64 with prior hysterectomy, were observed postoperatively for a median of 35.5 (0-74) months. Demographics of the two groups were similar, with a mean age of 65.1-9.4 years and a mean body mass index of 25.8 +/- 4.2 kg/m(2). Eighty percent of colpopexies used prolene sythetic mesh and 20% allograft material. Initial operative and hospital complications were rare in both groups and included a blood transfusion of 2 U, a ureteral transection, a wound infection, heart block, and an arrhythmia. Delayed graft complications included one mesh erosion in a patient with a prior hysterectomy that was managed by office resection (0.8%). CONCLUSION: Concurrent hysterectomy with abdominal sacral colopopexy has a low incidence of mesh complications and can be used as a first-line treatment for genital prolapse.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 310
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Baden W F, 1968, Tex Med, V64, P56
[2]   Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Barber, MD ;
Visco, AG ;
Weidner, AC ;
Amundsen, CL ;
Bump, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (06) :1402-1410
[3]  
BENSON JT, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P387
[4]   Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation [J].
Benson, JT ;
Lucente, V ;
McClellan, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1418-1421
[5]   ANATOMIC ASPECTS OF VAGINAL EVERSION AFTER HYSTERECTOMY [J].
DELANCEY, JOL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (06) :1717-1728
[6]   TOTAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY AT ABDOMINAL SACROVAGINOPEXY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY [J].
FEDORKOW, DM ;
KALBFLEISCH, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (03) :641-643
[7]   POSTERIOR CULDEPLASTY - REVISITED [J].
GIVEN, FT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 153 (02) :135-139
[8]  
HOLLEY RL, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V180, P444
[9]  
IMPARATO E, 1992, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V175, P233
[10]   High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse [J].
Karram, M ;
Goldwasser, S ;
Kleeman, S ;
Steele, A ;
Vassallo, B ;
Walsh, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) :1339-1342