Evaluating the performance of very weak subgrade soils treated/stabilized with cementitious materials for sustainable pavements

被引:64
作者
Ardah, Allam [1 ]
Chen, Qiming [2 ]
Abu-Farsakh, Murad [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Louisiana Transportat Res Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70808 USA
关键词
Resilient modulus; Weak subgrade; Wet subgrade; Class C fly ash; Hydrated lime; Portland cement type I; FLY-ASH;
D O I
10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.05.002
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of laboratory tests that were conducted to determine the proper treatment/stabilization recipe of very weak subgrade soils at high moisture contents, and to evaluate the corresponding performance-related properties [e.g., the resilient modulus and permanent deformation] for use in the design of sustainable pavement structures. Four different subgrade soil types of different plasticity indices were considered in this study. Three different moisture contents were selected at the wet-side of optimum that correspond to a raw soil strength value of 172 kPa (25 psi) or less. All the soils were treated with different combinations of class C fly ash (or Portland cement type I) and hydrated lime to achieve a 7-day target strength values of 345 kPa (50 psi) to create a working platform and 690 kPa (100 psi) to stabilize the subgrade for subbase application. Repeated load triaxial (RLT) tests were performed on laboratory molded specimens to evaluate their resilient modulus and permanent deformation behavior under cyclic loading. The AASHTO T-307 procedure was followed in this study to conduct the resilient modulus tests. A good correlation was observed between the water/additive ratio and the resilient modulus/permanent deformation, such that the soil specimens prepared at low water/additive ratio showed better performance than those prepared at high water/additive ratio. The results of laboratory tests showed that the use of direct correlation between unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and resilient modulus for cementitiously treated/stabilized soils can be misleading. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 119
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AASHTO. (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 2003, AASHTO T307-99 Standard Method of Test for. Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials
[2]   Laboratory characterization of cementitiously treated/stabilized very weak subgrade soil under cyclic loading [J].
Abu-Farsakh, Murad ;
Dhakal, Sanjay ;
Chen, Qiming .
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2015, 55 (03) :504-516
[3]  
Achampong F., 1997, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1589, P70, DOI DOI 10.3141/1589-12
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GUID MECH EMP DES NE
[5]  
[Anonymous], D523912 ASTM
[6]   Field Rutting Performance of Various Base and Subbase Materials Under Two Types of Loading [J].
Chen, Qiming ;
Abu-Farsakh, Murad Y. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2186) :90-100
[7]   Stabilizing soft fine-grained soils with fly ash [J].
Edil, TB ;
Acosta, HA ;
Benson, CH .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2006, 18 (02) :283-294
[8]  
HANDY RL, 1958, HIGHWAY RES BOARD B, V198, P55
[9]  
JANZ M, 2002, 9 SWED DEEP STAB RES
[10]  
Jones R., 1966, HIGHWAY RES REC, V128, P101