Market integration accounts for local variation in generalized altruism in a nationwide lost-letter experiment

被引:31
作者
Baldassarri, Delia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Sociol, 550 1St Ave, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] Bocconi Univ, Dondena Ctr Res Social Dynam, I-20136 Milan, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
prosocial behavior; generalized and parochial altruism; lost-letter experiment; market integration; social capital; PAROCHIAL ALTRUISM; COOPERATION; TRUST; NEIGHBORHOODS; DIVERSITY; EVOLUTION; FAIRNESS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1819934117
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
What explains variation in levels of prosocial behavior across communities? And are members of the ingroup and outgroup treated differently? According to evolutionary theories of generalized altruism, market integration should lead to greater levels of prosociality: Market exchange forces people to interact with unknown others, thus creating the conditions for the extension of prosocial behavior beyond close-knit circles to include outgroup members and strangers. Moving away from the evolutionary focus on cross-cultural variation, this article uses the market-integration hypothesis to explain intracultural variation in levels of prosociality in an advanced society. Taking advantage of an ideal setting, this study reports results from a large-scale, nationwide lost-letter experiment in which 5,980 letters were dispersed in a sample of 188 Italian communities. The study confirms the relevance of market integration in accounting for differences in levels of prosociality: In areas where market exchange is dominant, return rates are high. It also casts a light on the relationship between ingroup and outgroup prosociality: Return rates for both Italian and foreign recipients are the same; they vary together; and ingroup returns are highly predictive of outgroup returns at the community level.
引用
收藏
页码:2858 / 2863
页数:6
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Love Thy Neighbor? Ethnoracial Diversity and Trust Reexamined [J].
Abascal, Maria ;
Baldassarri, Delia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2015, 121 (03) :722-782
[2]  
Adida ClaireL., 2016, WHY MUSLIM INTEGRATI
[3]   Muslim Discrimination: Evidence From Two Lost-Letter Experiments [J].
Ahmed, Ali M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 40 (04) :888-898
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2 IND DIVIDE
[6]  
[Anonymous], DISTR IND 2011
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Can We Trust Trust?
[8]  
Baldassarri D., 2020, HARVARD DATAVERSE, DOI [10.7910/DVN/OKAHVZ, DOI 10.7910/DVN/OKAHVZ]
[9]   Field Experiments Across the Social Sciences [J].
Baldassarri, Delia ;
Abascal, Maria .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 43, 2017, 43 :41-73
[10]   Ingroup Favoritism in Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Balliet, Daniel ;
Wu, Junhui ;
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 140 (06) :1556-1581