Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation

被引:11
作者
Bose, Mats Wernfried Heinrich [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Beuer, Florian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schwitalla, Andreas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bruhnke, Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Herklotz, Insa [4 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Prosthodont, Geriatr Dent & Craniomandibular Disorders, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Humboldt Univ Berlin, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[3] Berlin Inst Hlth, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
[4] Dent Off Amalienpark Dr Thiele, Herklotz & Dr Amalien pk 1, D-13187 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Computer-assisted surgery; Dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery; Static computer-assisted implant surgery; Dental implants; Dynamic navigation; Backward planning; COMPUTER-TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS; ACCURACY; SURGERY; METAANALYSIS; DENTISTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104265
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the planned (PIP) and transferred implant position (TIP) after dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps utilizing dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (dCAIS). Methods: Five pairs of artificial jaws (n = 5) with four single tooth gaps in FDI (Fe'de'ration Dentaire Inter-nationale) regions 16, 25, 36 and 44 were manufactured via injection molding technique. Cone beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) were made and digital implant planning of twenty implants (n = 20) was performed with a dynamic navigation system (DNS, Navident, ClaroNav, Toronto, Canada). After guided drilling and manual implant placement, post-operative CBCTs were made. Global deviations at entry point (two-dimensional, 2D), apex (three-dimensional, 3D), apex (vertical, V) and angulation (in degrees, ) were calculated by DNS software. For statistical analysis, level of significance was set top < 0.05. Results: Mean deviation at the implants entry point (2D) was 0.78 & PLUSMN; 0.45 mm (range: 0.10-1.63 mm). For the implants apex (3D) and the implants apex (V) deviations were 1.08 +/- 0.50 mm (range: 0.33-2.10 mm) and 0.32 +/- 0.22 mm (range: 0.02-0.90 mm), respectively. The median angular deviation () was 2.81 +/- 2.29 (range: 0.56-9.58). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found regarding apex (3D), apex (V), and angulation (') comparing I.-IV. quadrants. Conclusions: Using the investigated dCAIS seems to provide satisfactory results regarding TIP in single-tooth gaps in vitro. Due to documented deviations, a safety distance of more than 2 mm should be respected while implant planning in DNS software. Clinical significance: The investigated DNS seems to be reliant in transferring PIP with acceptable deviations in vitro.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants [J].
Albrektsson, Tomas ;
Chrcanovic, Bruno ;
Ostman, Per-Olov ;
Sennerby, Lars .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) :41-50
[2]   Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Aydemir, Ceyda Aktolun ;
Arisan, Volkan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (03) :255-263
[3]   Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance [J].
Block, Michael S. ;
Emery, Robert W. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (02) :269-277
[4]   Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions [J].
Bosshardt, Dieter D. ;
Chappuis, Vivianne ;
Buser, Daniel .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) :22-40
[5]   Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies [J].
Bover-Ramos, Fernando ;
Vina-Almunia, Jose ;
Cervera-Ballester, Juan ;
Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel ;
Garcia-Mira, Berta .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (01) :101-115
[6]   A Novel Application of Dynamic Navigation System in Socket Shield Technique [J].
Chen, Joey T. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2019, 45 (05) :409-415
[7]   Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery [J].
D'haese, Jan ;
Ackhurst, Johan ;
Wismeijer, Daniel ;
De Bruyn, Hugo ;
Tahmaseb, Ali .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) :121-133
[8]   Quantification of Image Artifacts from Navigation Markers in Dynamic Guided Implant Surgery and the Effect on Registration Performance in Different Clinical Scenarios [J].
Du, Yu ;
Wangrao, Kaijuan ;
Liu, Liu ;
Liu, Li ;
Yao, Yang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (03) :726-736
[9]  
Garber D A, 1995, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V16, P798
[10]   Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review [J].
Gargallo-Albiola, Jordi ;
Barootchi, Shayan ;
Salomo-Coll, Oscar ;
Wang, Hom-lay .
ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2019, 225 :1-10