Motor Creativity and Creative Thinking in Children: The Diverging Role of Inhibition

被引:73
作者
Scibinetti, Patrizia
Tocci, Nicoletta
Pesce, Caterina
机构
[1] Department of Education in Sport and Human Motion, Italian University Sport and Movement-IUSM, 00135 Rome
关键词
EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; RANDOM GENERATION; MOVEMENT ABILITY; ATTENTION; AGE; CEREBELLUM; PROGRAM; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1080/10400419.2011.595993
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study investigated the commonalities and differences between motor creativity and creative thinking in children and how executive functions differently influence them. Thirty-one children, aged 7 to 8 years, were administered Bertsch Test of Motor Creativity, Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, the Random Number Generation (RNG) task tapping executive functions, and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC). Scores for three dimensions of motor creativity and creative thinking (fluency, flexibility, and originality), selected indexes of executive function (inhibition and working memory updating) and motor competence scores were submitted to correlational and regression analyses. Results showed that there is no association between motor creativity and motor competence, but a significant association between creative moving and thinking for all their dimensions except for originality. Moreover, originality in thinking was predicted by low inhibitory ability, although originality in moving by high inhibitory ability. Results suggested that there are commonalities in the processes responsible for the fluent and flexible production of creative thoughts and movements, whereas there was a domain-specificity as concerns the role played by inhibitory functions in the production of original solutions during creative moving.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 272
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abraham Anna, 2007, Cogn Neuropsychiatry, V12, P235, DOI 10.1080/13546800601046714
[2]  
Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity
[3]   Bridging Generality and Specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of Creativity [J].
Baer, John ;
Kaufman, James C. .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2005, 27 (03) :158-163
[4]   Executive Function: The Search for an Integrated Account [J].
Banich, Marie T. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 18 (02) :89-94
[5]  
Bekhtereva N. P., 2001, HUMAN PHYSL, V27, P390, DOI [10.1023/A:1010946332369, DOI 10.1023/A:1010946332369]
[6]  
Bertsch J., 1983, CREATIVITE MOTRICE S
[7]   Executive functions after age 5: Changes and correlates [J].
Best, John R. ;
Miller, Patricia H. ;
Jones, Lara L. .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2009, 29 (03) :180-200
[8]   Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals [J].
Carson, SH ;
Peterson, JB ;
Higgins, DM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (03) :499-506
[9]   YOUNG CHILDRENS DIVERGENT MOVEMENT ABILITY - STUDY 2 [J].
CLELAND, FE .
JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, 1994, 13 (03) :228-241
[10]   Creativity lost - The importance of testing higher-level executive functions in school-age children and adolescents [J].
Delis, Dean C. ;
Lansing, Amy ;
Houston, Wes S. ;
Wetter, Spencer ;
Han, S. Duke ;
Jacobson, Mark ;
Holdnack, James ;
Kramer, Joel .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2007, 25 (01) :29-40