Factors affecting fixation of the glenoid component of a reverse total shoulder prothesis

被引:77
作者
Chebli, Caroline [1 ]
Huber, Philippe [1 ]
Watling, Jonathan [1 ]
Bertelsen, Alexander [1 ]
Bicknell, Ryan T. [1 ]
Matsen, Frederick, III [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.015
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The semiconstrained design of the reverse arthroplasty allows loads from the humerus to challenge the fixation of the glenoid component to the scapula. We examined some of the factors affecting the quality of glenoid screw fixation, including the density of the material into which the screws ore placed, the purchase of individual screws, and the direction of loading in relation to screw placement. Loads were applied by the humeral component to glenoid components with different conditions of fixation. The load to failure for each set of conditions was measured and compared statistically. Load to failure was less when the glenoid component was fixed to material of lesser density. Each screw contributed to the quality of fixation; the screw nearest the point of load application made the largest contribution. Load to failure was less when the load was colinear with a line through the nonlocking holes in the base plate compared to colinear with a line through the locking holes. In performing a reverse total shoulder, surgeons should emphasize secure intraosseous placement of the fixation screws in the best quality bone available. The placement of the inferior screw appears to be the most critical.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 327
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Analysis of glenoid fixation for a reversed anatomy fixed-fulcrum shoulder replacement
    Ahir, SP
    Walker, PS
    Squire-Taylor, CJ
    Blunn, GW
    Bayley, JIL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 37 (11) : 1699 - 1708
  • [2] Mechanical testing of shoulder prostheses and recommendations for glenoid design
    Anglin, C
    Wyss, UP
    Pichora, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2000, 9 (04) : 323 - 331
  • [3] Does keel size, the use of screws, and the use of bone cement affect fixation of a metal glenoid implant?
    Bicknell, RT
    Liew, ASL
    Danter, MR
    Patterson, SD
    King, GJW
    Chess, DG
    Johnson, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2003, 12 (03) : 268 - 275
  • [4] Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty
    Bohsali, Kamal I.
    Wirth, Michael A.
    Rockwood, Charles A., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (10) : 2279 - 2292
  • [5] Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: Results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty
    Boileau, Pascal
    Watkinson, Duncan
    Hatzidakis, Armodios M.
    Hovorka, Istvan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (05) : 527 - 540
  • [6] Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws
    Chapman, JR
    Harrington, RM
    Lee, KM
    Anderson, PA
    Tencer, AF
    Kowalski, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1996, 118 (03): : 391 - 398
  • [7] Finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of a scapula implanted with a glenoid prosthesis
    Couteau, B
    Mansat, P
    Estivalèzes, É
    Darmana, R
    Mansat, M
    Egan, J
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 16 (07) : 566 - 575
  • [8] Humeral prosthetic failure of reversed total shoulder arthroplasty: A report of three cases
    De Wilde, L
    Walch, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (02) : 260 - 264
  • [9] Shoulder prostheses treating cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative biomechanical study
    De Wilde, LF
    Audenaert, EA
    Berghs, BM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2004, 22 (06) : 1222 - 1230
  • [10] De Wilde Lieven, 2003, Acta Orthop Belg, V69, P495