Lean and agile performance framework for manufacturing enterprises

被引:25
作者
Soltan, Hassan
Mostafa, Sherif [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Engn, Prod Engn & Mech Design Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
来源
2ND INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS, INDUSTRIAL, AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, MIMEC2015 | 2015年 / 2卷
关键词
Supply chain; Lean; Agile; Performance; AHP; ANP; SUPPLY CHAIN; LEAGILE;
D O I
10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.082
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The overall performance of a manufacturing organization is a drastic function of the strategies applied to its physical sectors. Traditional strategies were based on the principle of economies of scale, which resulted in excess of waste and difficulty of reconfiguration. Global competition necessitates formulating efficient and effective paradigms in response to the global economies to improve the overall performance. Lean and agile manufacturing have been widely adopted in recent years' enterprises. Leanness mainly leads to eliminating the non-value added activities while agility focuses on leads to market responsiveness. This paper discusses the leanness and agility definitions, factors, paradigms, differences, and combination. A hierarchic framework is presented which can be used to measure the leanness, agility, leagility, and overall performance of an enterprise, further, to compare different enterprises. This enables using the multi-criteria decision making methods especially AHP and ANP. Levels of leanness and agility can be fed as input to define a variety of enterprises. Moreover, a different view is introduced for general features of an efficient/effective manufacturing organization irrespective to the definitions of leanness and agility. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 484
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Modeling agility of supply [J].
Agarwal, Ashish ;
Shankar, Ravi ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2007, 36 (04) :443-457
[2]   Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach [J].
Agarwal, Ashish ;
Shankar, Ravi ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 173 (01) :211-225
[3]   Establishing and improving manufacturing performance measures [J].
Ahmad, MM ;
Dhafr, N .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2002, 18 (3-4) :171-176
[4]  
Chan A. P. C., 2004, Benchmarking, V11, P203, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14635770410532624, 10.1108/14635770410532624]
[5]  
Christopher Martin., 2001, INT J PHYS DISTRIB, V31, P235, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09600030110394914, 10.1108/09600030110394910]
[6]   Internet-based CDSS for modern manufacturing processes selection and justification [J].
Cil, I .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2004, 20 (03) :177-190
[7]   An ANP-based assessment model for lean enterprise transformation [J].
Cil, Ibrahim ;
Turkan, Yusuf S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (5-8) :1113-1130
[8]   Defining a framework for information systems requirements for agile manufacturing [J].
Coronado, AE ;
Sarhadi, M ;
Millar, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2002, 75 (1-2) :57-68
[9]  
Dubey R., 2014, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, P1
[10]   Hybrid lean-agile manufacturing system technical facet, in automotive sector [J].
Elmoselhy, Salah A. M. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2013, 32 (04) :598-619