Signal-to-Noise Ratio Improvement in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT and MR Imaging with Automated Principal Component Analysis Filtering

被引:15
|
作者
Balvay, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Kachenoura, Nadjia [3 ]
Espinoza, Sophie [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle [1 ]
Fournier, Laure S. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Clement, Olivier [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Cuenod, Charles-Andre [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Paris Cardiovasc Res Ctr PARCC, INSERM, U970, F-75015 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 06, INSERM, U678, UPMC, Paris, France
[4] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Radiol, Paris, France
关键词
MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; TUMOR PERFUSION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; DCE-MRI; ANGIOGENESIS; PERMEABILITY; CANCER; INHIBITOR;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.10100231
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop a new automated filtering technique and to evaluate its ability to compensate for the known low contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomographic (CT) data, without substantial loss of information. Materials and Methods: Clinical data acquisition for this study was approved by the institutional review board. Principal component analysis (PCA) was combined with the fraction of residual information (FRI) criterion to optimize the balance between noise reduction efficiency and information conservation. The PCA FRI filter was evaluated in 15 DCE MR imaging data sets and 15 DCE CT data sets by two radiologists who performed visual analysis and quantitative assessment of noise reduction after filtering. Results: Visual evaluation revealed a substantial noise reduction while conserving information in 90% of MR imaging cases and 87% of CT cases for image analysis and in 93% of MR imaging cases and 90% of CT cases for signal analysis. Efficient denoising enabled improvement in structure characterization in 60% of MR imaging cases and 77% of CT cases. After filtering, CNR was improved by 2.06 +/- 0.89 for MR imaging (P < .01) and by 5.72 +/- 4.82 for CT (P < .01). Conclusion: This PCA FRI filter demonstrates noise reduction efficiency and information conservation for both DCE MR data and DCE CT data. FRI analysis enabled automated optimization of the parameters for the PCA filter and provided an optional visual control of residual information losses. The robust and fast PCA FRI filter may improve qualitative or quantitative analysis of DCE imaging in a clinical context. (C)RSNA, 2010 Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10100231/-/DC1
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 445
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Principal Component Analysis of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI in Human Prostate Cancer
    Eyal, Erez
    Bloch, B. Nicolas
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Furman-Haran, Edna
    Genega, Elizabeth M.
    Lenkinski, Robert E.
    Degani, Hadassa
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (04) : 174 - 181
  • [42] Comparison between PUN and Tofts models in the quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Mazzetti, S.
    Gliozzi, A. S.
    Bracco, C.
    Russo, F.
    Regge, D.
    Stasi, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (24) : 8443 - 8453
  • [43] Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging in MRI and CT: Theoretical Models and Current Implementation
    Pelgrim, G. J.
    Handayani, A.
    Dijkstra, H.
    Prakken, N. H. J.
    Slart, R. H. J. A.
    Oudkerk, M.
    Van Ooijen, P. M. A.
    Vliegenthart, R.
    Sijens, P. E.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [44] Discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions using volumetric quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Cheng, Ziliang
    Wu, Zhuo
    Shi, Guangzi
    Yi, Zhilong
    Xie, Mingwei
    Zeng, Weike
    Song, Chao
    Zheng, Chushan
    Shen, Jun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (03) : 982 - 991
  • [45] Abbreviated breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for lesion detection and characterization: the experience of an Italian oncologic center
    Petrillo, Antonella
    Fusco, Roberta
    Sansone, Mario
    Cerbone, Marilena
    Filice, Salvatore
    Porto, Annamaria
    Rubulotta, Maria Rosaria
    D'Aiuto, Massimiliano
    Avino, Franca
    Di Bonito, Maurizio
    Botti, Gerardo
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (02) : 401 - 410
  • [46] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging in the Head and Neck: Correlation with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Xu, Xiao Quan
    Choi, Young Jun
    Sung, Yu Sub
    Yoon, Ra Gyoung
    Jang, Seung Won
    Park, Ji Eun
    Heo, Young Jin
    Baek, Jung Hwan
    Lee, Jeong Hyun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 17 (05) : 641 - 649
  • [47] Early evaluation of irradiated parotid glands with intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging: correlation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Zhou, Nan
    Chu, Chen
    Dou, Xin
    Li, Ming
    Liu, Song
    Zhu, Lijing
    Liu, Baorui
    Guo, Tingting
    Chen, Weibo
    He, Jian
    Yan, Jing
    Zhou, Zhengyang
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    Liu, Tian
    BMC CANCER, 2016, 16
  • [48] Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images
    Yabuuchi, Hidetake
    Matsuo, Yoshio
    Kamitani, Takeshi
    Setoguchi, Taro
    Okafuji, Takashi
    Soeda, Hiroyasu
    Sakai, Shuji
    Hatakenaka, Masamitsu
    Kubo, Makoto
    Tokunaga, Eriko
    Yamamoto, Hidetaka
    Honda, Hiroshi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (01) : E126 - E132
  • [49] Challenges in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of cervical lymph nodes to detect metastatic disease
    Noworolski, SM
    Fischbein, NJ
    Kaplan, MJ
    Lu, Y
    Nelson, SJ
    Carvajal, L
    Henry, RG
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 17 (04) : 455 - 462
  • [50] Characterization of focal hepatic masses by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Findings in 311 lesions
    Quillin, SP
    Atilla, S
    Brown, JJ
    Borrello, JA
    Yu, CY
    Pilgram, TK
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 15 (03) : 275 - 285