Antiplatelet drugs for secondary prevention in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:17
作者
Del Giovane, Cinzia [1 ,2 ]
Boncoraglio, Giorgio B. [3 ]
Bertu, Lorenza [4 ]
Banzi, Rita [5 ]
Tramacere, Irene [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Primary Hlth Care BIHAM, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Fribourg, Populat Hlth Lab, Fribourg, Switzerland
[3] Ist Neurol Carlo Besta, Fdn IRCCS, Dept Cerebrovasc Dis, Milan, Italy
[4] Ist Neurol Carlo Besta, Fdn IRCCS, Dept Res & Clin Dev, Milan, Italy
[5] IRCCS, Ist Ric Farmacol Mario Negri, Ctr Hlth Regulatory Policies, Milan, Italy
关键词
Systematic review; Network meta-analysis; RCT; Stroke; Secondary prevention; Antiplatelet drugs; RISK; INCONSISTENCY; CONSISTENCY; CILOSTAZOL; THERAPY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-021-02341-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Antiplatelet drugs may prevent recurrent ischemic events after ischemic stroke but their relative effectiveness and harms still need to be clarified. Within this network meta-analysis we aimed to summarize the current evidence for using antiplatelet drugs for secondary stroke prevention. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL up to September 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing antiplatelet drugs for secondary stroke prevention were included. We did pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses using random-effects models. Primary outcomes were all strokes (ischemic or hemorrhagic) and all-cause mortality. Results: The review included 57 RCTs, 50 (n = 165,533 participants) provided data for the meta-analyses. Compared to placebo/no treatment, moderate to high-confidence evidence indicated that cilostazol, clopidogrel, dipyridamole + aspirin, ticagrelor, ticlopidine, and aspirin <= 150 mg/day significantly reduced the risk of all strokes (odds ratios, ORs and absolute risk difference, ARD): cilostazol 0.51 (95 % confidence interval, CI, 0.37 to 0.71; 3.6 % fewer), clopidogrel 0.63 (95 % CI, 0.49 to 0.79; 2.7 % fewer), dipyridamole + aspirin 0.65 (95 % CI, 0.55 to 0.78; 2.5 % fewer), ticagrelor 0.68 (95 % CI, 0.50 to 0.93; 2.3 % fewer), ticlopidine 0.74 (95 % CI 0.59 to 0.93; 1.9 % fewer), aspirin <= 150 mg/day 0.79 (95 % CI, 0.66 to 0.95; 1.5 % fewer). Aspirin > 150 mg/day and the combinations clopidogrel/aspirin, ticagrelor/aspirin, also decrease all strokes but increase the risk of hemorrhagic events. Only aspirin > 150 mg/day significantly reduced all-cause mortality (OR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.76 to 0.97; ARD 0.9 %, 95 %CI 1.5-0.2 % fewer, moderate confidence). Compared to aspirin <= 150 mg/day, clopidogrel significantly reduced the risk of all strokes, cardiovascular events, and intracranial hemorrhage outcomes. Cilostazol also appeared to provide advantages but data are limited to the Asian population. Conclusions: Considering the benefits and harms ratio, cilostazol, clopidogrel, dipyridamole + aspirin, ticagrelor, ticlopidine, and aspirin <= 150 mg/day appear to be the best choices as antiplatelet drugs for secondary prevention of patients with ischemic stroke or TIA. Systematic review registration PROSPERO .
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   CLASSIFICATION OF SUBTYPE OF ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE - DEFINITIONS FOR USE IN A MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
ADAMS, HP ;
BENDIXEN, BH ;
KAPPELLE, LJ ;
BILLER, J ;
LOVE, BB ;
GORDON, DL ;
MARSH, EE ;
KASE, CS ;
WOLF, PA ;
BABIKIAN, VL ;
LICATAGEHR, EE ;
ALLEN, N ;
BRASS, LM ;
FAYAD, PB ;
PAVALKIS, FJ ;
WEINBERGER, JM ;
TUHRIM, S ;
RUDOLPH, SH ;
HOROWITZ, DR ;
BITTON, A ;
MOHR, JP ;
SACCO, RL ;
CLAVIJO, M ;
ROSENBAUM, DM ;
SPARR, SA ;
KATZ, P ;
KLONOWSKI, E ;
CULEBRAS, A ;
CAREY, G ;
MARTIR, NI ;
FICARRA, C ;
HOGAN, EL ;
CARTER, T ;
GURECKI, P ;
MUNTZ, BK ;
RAMIREZLASSEPAS, M ;
TULLOCH, JW ;
QUINONES, MR ;
MENDEZ, M ;
ZHANG, SM ;
ALA, T ;
JOHNSTON, KC ;
ANDERSON, DC ;
TARREL, RM ;
NANCE, MA ;
BUDLIE, SR ;
DIERICH, M ;
HELGASON, CM ;
HIER, DB ;
SHAPIRO, RA .
STROKE, 1993, 24 (01) :35-41
[2]   One-Year Risk of Stroke after Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke [J].
Amarenco, Pierre ;
Lavallee, Philippa C. ;
Labreuche, Julien ;
Albers, Gregory W. ;
Bornstein, Natan M. ;
Canhao, Patricia ;
Caplan, Louis R. ;
Donnan, Geoffrey A. ;
Ferro, Jose M. ;
Hennerici, Michael G. ;
Molina, Carlos ;
Rothwell, Peter M. ;
Sissani, Leila ;
Skoloudik, David ;
Steg, Philippe Gabriel ;
Touboul, Pierre-Jean ;
Uchiyama, Shinichiro ;
Vicaut, Eric ;
Wong, Lawrence K. S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (16) :1533-1542
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, GRADEPRO GDT GRADEPR
[4]  
Baigent C, 2002, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V324, P71, DOI 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71
[5]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[6]  
Chairangsarit Parnsiri, 2005, J Med Assoc Thai, V88 Suppl 3, pS148
[7]  
de Falco F A, 1991, Clin Ter, V138, P21
[8]   Antithrombotic Therapy to Prevent Recurrent Strokes in Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease JACC Scientific Expert Panel [J].
Del Brutto, Victor J. ;
Chaturvedi, Seemant ;
Diener, Hans-Christoph ;
Romano, Jose G. ;
Sacco, Ralph L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (06) :786-803
[9]   Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis [J].
Dias, S. ;
Welton, N. J. ;
Caldwell, D. M. ;
Ades, A. E. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (7-8) :932-944
[10]  
Food and Drug Administration, BRILINTA TIC PRESCR