Team-based model for non-operating room airway management: validation using a simulation-based study

被引:1
|
作者
DeMaria, S., Jr. [1 ]
Berman, D. J. [1 ]
Goldberg, A. [1 ]
Lin, H. -M. [1 ]
Khelemsky, Y. [1 ]
Levine, A. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Anesthesiol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl Box 1010, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
airway management; high-fidelity simulation; team-based anaesthesia; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; TRACHEAL INTUBATIONS; COMPLICATIONS; EDUCATION; IMPACT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aew121
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Non-operating room(non-OR) airway management has previously been identified as an area of concern because it carries a significant risk for complications. One reason for this could be attributed to the independent practice of residents in these situations. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether differences in performance exist between residents working alone vs with a resident partner when encountering simulated non-OR airway management scenarios. Methods: Thirty-six anaesthesia residents were randomized into two groups. Each group experienced three separate scenarios (two scenarios initially and then a third 6 weeks later). The scenarios consisted of one control scenario and two critical event scenarios [i.e. asystole during laryngoscopy and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) upon post-intubation institution of positive pressure ventilation]. One group experienced the simulated non-OR scenarios alone (Solo group). The other group consisted of resident pairs, participating in the same three scenarios (Team group). Results: Although the time to intubation did not differ between the Solo and Team groups, there were several differences in performance. The Team group received better overall performance ratings for the asystole (8.5 vs 5.5 out of 10; P<0.001) and PEA (8.5 vs 5.8 out of 10; P<0.001) scenarios. The Team group was also able to recognize asystole and PEA conditions faster than the Solo group [10.1 vs 23.5 s (P<0.001) and 13.3 vs 36.0 s (P<0.001), respectively]. Conclusions: Residents who performed a simulated intubation with a second trained provider had better overall performance than those who practised independently. The residents who practised in a group were also faster to diagnose serious complications, including peri-intubation asystole and PEA. Given these data, it is reasonable that training programmes consider performing all non-OR airway management with a team-based method.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Objective Measurement of Learners' Cognitive Load During Simulation-Based Trauma Team Training: A Pilot Study
    Park, Sandra Hyunsoo
    Goldberg, Scott A.
    Al-Ballaa, Abdulrahman
    Tayeb, Baraa
    Basurrah, Mohammed
    Abahuje, Egide
    Miccile, Chrisitian
    Pozner, Charles N.
    Yule, Steven
    Dias, Roger Daglius
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 279 : 361 - 367
  • [42] A Validation Argument for a Simulation-Based Training Course Centered on Assessment, Recognition, and Early Management of Pediatric Sepsis
    Geis, Gary L.
    Wheeler, Derek S.
    Bunger, Amy
    Militello, Laura G.
    Taylor, Regina G.
    Bauer, Jerome P.
    Byczkowski, Terri L.
    Kerrey, Benjamin T.
    Patterson, Mary D.
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2018, 13 (01): : 16 - 26
  • [43] Evaluation of acute asthma management among emergency doctors using simulation-based assessment
    Nagaretnam, Bhasyani
    Jamal, Shamsuriani Md
    Abu Bakar, Afliza
    Zaini, Ida Zarina
    Saiboon, Ismail M.
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (28) : E34095
  • [44] The effect of a team-based blended simulation training program on cardiopulmonary resuscitation on healthcare professionals' perception, performance, and costs: a mixed-method study
    Palmisano, Francesco
    Santuari, Nadia
    Moletta, Cristina
    Ambrosi, Elisa
    Rizzoli, Andrea
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [45] A simulation-based intervention teaching seizure management to caregivers: A randomized controlled pilot study
    Sigalet, Elaine
    Cheng, Adam
    Donnon, Tyrone
    Koot, Deanna
    Chatfield, Jennifer
    Robinson, Traci
    Catena, Helen
    Grant, Vincent J.
    PAEDIATRICS & CHILD HEALTH, 2014, 19 (07) : 373 - 378
  • [46] Improving diagnostic accuracy using EHR in emergency departments: A simulation-based study
    Ben-Assuli, Ofir
    Sagi, Doron
    Leshno, Moshe
    Ironi, Avinoah
    Ziv, Arnitai
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 55 : 31 - 40
  • [47] Effectiveness of remote simulation-based learning for periodontal instrumentation: A non-inferiority study
    Oh, Se-Lim
    Mishler, Oksana
    Yang, Ji Seung
    Barnes, Christine
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2022, 86 (04) : 463 - 471
  • [48] Focused and Corrective Feedback Versus Structured and Supported Debriefing in a Simulation-Based Cardiac Arrest Team Training A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study
    Kim, Ji-Hoon
    Kim, Young-Min
    Park, Seong Heui
    Ju, Eun A.
    Choi, Se Min
    Hong, Tai Yong
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2017, 12 (03): : 157 - 164
  • [49] A comparative study on the effectiveness of online and in-class team-based learning on student performance and perceptions in virtual simulation experiments
    Shen, Jing
    Qi, Hongyan
    Mei, Ruhuan
    Sun, Cencen
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [50] Simulation-based education for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and airway management protocols: a brief report of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    A Cortegiani
    V Russotto
    A Naro
    G Sanzo
    G Grutta
    SM Raineri
    A Giarratano
    Critical Care, 18 (Suppl 1):