Team-based model for non-operating room airway management: validation using a simulation-based study

被引:1
|
作者
DeMaria, S., Jr. [1 ]
Berman, D. J. [1 ]
Goldberg, A. [1 ]
Lin, H. -M. [1 ]
Khelemsky, Y. [1 ]
Levine, A. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Anesthesiol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl Box 1010, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
airway management; high-fidelity simulation; team-based anaesthesia; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; TRACHEAL INTUBATIONS; COMPLICATIONS; EDUCATION; IMPACT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aew121
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Non-operating room(non-OR) airway management has previously been identified as an area of concern because it carries a significant risk for complications. One reason for this could be attributed to the independent practice of residents in these situations. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether differences in performance exist between residents working alone vs with a resident partner when encountering simulated non-OR airway management scenarios. Methods: Thirty-six anaesthesia residents were randomized into two groups. Each group experienced three separate scenarios (two scenarios initially and then a third 6 weeks later). The scenarios consisted of one control scenario and two critical event scenarios [i.e. asystole during laryngoscopy and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) upon post-intubation institution of positive pressure ventilation]. One group experienced the simulated non-OR scenarios alone (Solo group). The other group consisted of resident pairs, participating in the same three scenarios (Team group). Results: Although the time to intubation did not differ between the Solo and Team groups, there were several differences in performance. The Team group received better overall performance ratings for the asystole (8.5 vs 5.5 out of 10; P<0.001) and PEA (8.5 vs 5.8 out of 10; P<0.001) scenarios. The Team group was also able to recognize asystole and PEA conditions faster than the Solo group [10.1 vs 23.5 s (P<0.001) and 13.3 vs 36.0 s (P<0.001), respectively]. Conclusions: Residents who performed a simulated intubation with a second trained provider had better overall performance than those who practised independently. The residents who practised in a group were also faster to diagnose serious complications, including peri-intubation asystole and PEA. Given these data, it is reasonable that training programmes consider performing all non-OR airway management with a team-based method.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of simulation-based training workshop on obstetric emergency team collaboration and communication: a mixed study
    Wu, Na
    Li, Wei
    Huang, Rong
    Jiang, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [32] A Case Study of a Team-Based, Quality-Focused Compensation Model for Primary Care Providers
    Greene, Jessica
    Hibbard, Judith H.
    Overton, Valerie
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2014, 71 (03) : 207 - 223
  • [33] Training fellows in neonatal tele-resuscitation using a simulation-based mastery learning model
    Mavis, Stephanie C.
    Kreofsky, Beth L.
    Ouk, Melody Y.
    Carey, William A.
    Fang, Jennifer L.
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2021, 8
  • [34] Effect of simulation-based emergency airway management education on the knowledge, skills and perceived confidence of medical interns
    Basnet, Samjhana
    Shrestha, Sailesh P.
    Shrestha, Roshana
    Shrestha, Anmol P.
    Shrestha, Ashish
    Sahu, Sandeep
    Mhatre, Bhavana
    Silwal, Prabhat
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 86 (09): : 5191 - 5198
  • [35] Using Simulation-Based Education to Teach Interruption Management Skills: An Integrative Review
    Hill, Peggy P.
    Diaz, Desiree A.
    Anderson, Mindi
    Talbert, Steven
    Maraj, Crystal
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2022, 64 : 46 - 57
  • [36] Comparison of 4 Laryngoscopes in 2 Difficult Airway Scenarios A Randomized Crossover Simulation-Based Study
    Altun, Demet
    Ozkan-Seyhan, Tulay
    Orhan-Sungur, Mukadder
    Sivrikoz, Nukhet
    Camci, Emre
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2016, 11 (05): : 304 - 308
  • [37] Addressing Dual Patient and Staff Safety Through A Team-Based Standardized Patient Simulation for Agitation Management in the Emergency Department
    Wong, Ambrose H.
    Auerbach, Marc A.
    Ruppel, Halley
    Crispino, Lauren J.
    Rosenberg, Alana
    Iennaco, Joanne D.
    Vaca, Federico E.
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2018, 13 (03): : 154 - 162
  • [38] Modeling Students' Perceptions of Simulation-Based Learning Using the Technology Acceptance Model
    Lemay, David John
    Morin, Matthew M.
    Bazelais, Paul
    Doleck, Tenzin
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2018, 20 : 28 - 37
  • [39] Association of self-esteem, personality, stress and gender with performance of a resuscitation team: A simulation-based study
    Tramer, Lucas
    Becker, Christoph
    Schumacher, Cleo
    Beck, Katharina
    Tschan, Franziska
    Semmer, Norbert K.
    Hochstrasser, Seraina
    Marsch, Stephan
    Hunziker, Sabina
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05):
  • [40] Leaders' and followers' individual experiences during the early phase of simulation-based team training: an exploratory study
    Meurling, Lisbet
    Hedman, Leif
    Fellander-Tsai, Li
    Wallin, Carl-Johan
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (06) : 459 - 467