Team-based model for non-operating room airway management: validation using a simulation-based study

被引:1
|
作者
DeMaria, S., Jr. [1 ]
Berman, D. J. [1 ]
Goldberg, A. [1 ]
Lin, H. -M. [1 ]
Khelemsky, Y. [1 ]
Levine, A. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Anesthesiol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl Box 1010, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
airway management; high-fidelity simulation; team-based anaesthesia; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; TRACHEAL INTUBATIONS; COMPLICATIONS; EDUCATION; IMPACT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aew121
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Non-operating room(non-OR) airway management has previously been identified as an area of concern because it carries a significant risk for complications. One reason for this could be attributed to the independent practice of residents in these situations. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether differences in performance exist between residents working alone vs with a resident partner when encountering simulated non-OR airway management scenarios. Methods: Thirty-six anaesthesia residents were randomized into two groups. Each group experienced three separate scenarios (two scenarios initially and then a third 6 weeks later). The scenarios consisted of one control scenario and two critical event scenarios [i.e. asystole during laryngoscopy and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) upon post-intubation institution of positive pressure ventilation]. One group experienced the simulated non-OR scenarios alone (Solo group). The other group consisted of resident pairs, participating in the same three scenarios (Team group). Results: Although the time to intubation did not differ between the Solo and Team groups, there were several differences in performance. The Team group received better overall performance ratings for the asystole (8.5 vs 5.5 out of 10; P<0.001) and PEA (8.5 vs 5.8 out of 10; P<0.001) scenarios. The Team group was also able to recognize asystole and PEA conditions faster than the Solo group [10.1 vs 23.5 s (P<0.001) and 13.3 vs 36.0 s (P<0.001), respectively]. Conclusions: Residents who performed a simulated intubation with a second trained provider had better overall performance than those who practised independently. The residents who practised in a group were also faster to diagnose serious complications, including peri-intubation asystole and PEA. Given these data, it is reasonable that training programmes consider performing all non-OR airway management with a team-based method.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation study of synthetic models for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF): A simulation-based training in pediatric surgery
    Petra, Zahradnikova
    Silvia, Hnilicova
    Martin, Lindak
    Rebeka, Pechanova
    Dominika, Stevkova
    Pavol, Vitovic
    Miroslava, Laurovicova
    Frantisek, Horn
    Tomas, Tvrdon
    Jozef, Babala
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY OPEN, 2025, 9
  • [22] Understanding medical professionalism using express team-based learning; a qualitative case-based study
    Guraya, Shaista Salman
    Guraya, Salman Yousuf
    Doubell, Fiza-Rashid
    Mathew, Bincy
    Clarke, Eric
    Ryan, Aine
    Fredericks, Salim
    Smyth, Mary
    Hand, Sinead
    Al-Qallaf, Amal
    Kelly, Helen
    Harkin, Denis W.
    MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2023, 28 (01):
  • [23] Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Team-Based Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Simulation Study: Exploratory Analysis
    Brown, Joan
    De-Oliveira, Sophia
    Mitchell, Christopher
    Cesar, Rachel Carmen
    Ding, Li
    Fix, Melissa
    Stemen, Daniel
    Yacharn, Krisda
    Wong, Se Fum
    Dhillon, Anahat
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 11
  • [24] How to Initiate and Perform Simulation-based Airway Management Training More Effectively and Efficiently in China?
    Yang, Dong
    Deng, Xiao-Ming
    Xue, Fu-Shan
    Zhi, Juan
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (04) : 472 - 477
  • [25] Effect of simulation-based training method on the psychological health promotion in operating room students during the educational internship
    Mohammadi, Gholamreza
    Tourdeh, Maedeh
    Ebrahimian, Abbasali
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [26] Using Continuous Peer Evaluation in Team-Based Engineering Capstone Projects: A Case Study
    Friess, Wilhelm A.
    Goupee, Andrew J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2020, 63 (02) : 82 - 87
  • [27] Airway management education: simulation based training versus non-simulation based training-A systematic review and meta-analyses
    Sun, Yanxia
    Pan, Chuxiong
    Li, Tianzuo
    Gan, Tong J.
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [28] Enhancing residents' neonatal resuscitation competency through team-based simulation training: an intervention educational study
    Farhadi, Roya
    Azandehi, Bita Khalili
    Amuei, Fattane
    Ahmadi, Mozhgan
    Zazoly, Atefeh Zabihi
    Ghorbani, Ali Asghar
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [29] Enhancing residents’ neonatal resuscitation competency through team-based simulation training: an intervention educational study
    Roya Farhadi
    Bita Khalili Azandehi
    Fattane Amuei
    Mozhgan Ahmadi
    Atefeh Zabihi Zazoly
    Ali Asghar Ghorbani
    BMC Medical Education, 23
  • [30] A Simulation-based Approach to Measuring Team Situational Awareness in Emergency Medicine: A Multicenter, Observational Study
    Rosenman, Elizabeth D.
    Dixon, Aurora J.
    Webb, Jessica M.
    Brolliar, Sarah
    Golden, Simon J.
    Jones, Kerin A.
    Shah, Sachita
    Grand, James A.
    Kozlowski, Steve W. J.
    Chao, Georgia T.
    Fernandez, Rosemarie
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 25 (02) : 196 - 204