The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda

被引:77
作者
Abramsky, Tanya [1 ]
Devries, Karen M. [1 ]
Michau, Lori [2 ]
Nakuti, Janet [2 ]
Musuya, Tina [3 ]
Kyegombe, Nambusi [1 ]
Watts, Charlotte [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Gender Violence & Hlth Ctr, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
[2] Raising Voices, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Ctr Domest Violence Prevent, Kampala, Uganda
关键词
RURAL SOUTH-AFRICA; PREVENT VIOLENCE; HEALTH; HIV; ABUSE; RISK;
D O I
10.1136/jech-2015-206665
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health and human rights concern, though there is limited evidence on how to prevent it. This secondary analysis of data from the SASA! Study assesses the potential of a community mobilisation IPV prevention intervention to reduce overall prevalence of IPV, new onset of abuse (primary prevention) and continuation of prior abuse (secondary prevention). Methods A pair-matched cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 8 communities (4 intervention, 4 control) in Kampala, Uganda (2007-2012). Cross-sectional surveys of community members, 18-49 years old, were undertaken at baseline (n=1583) and 4 years postintervention implementation (n=2532). Outcomes relate to women's past year experiences of physical and sexual IPV, emotional aggression, controlling behaviours and fear of partner. An adjusted cluster-level intention-to-treat analysis compared outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. Results At follow-up, all types of IPV (including severe forms of each) were lower in intervention communities compared with control communities. SASA! was associated with lower onset of abuse and lower continuation of prior abuse. Statistically significant effects were observed for continued physical IPV (adjusted risk ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96); continued sexual IPV (0.68, 0.53 to 0.87); continued emotional aggression (0.68, 0.52 to 0.89); continued fear of partner (0.67, 0.51 to 0.89); and new onset of controlling behaviours (0.38, 0.23 to 0.62). Conclusions Community mobilisation is an effective means for both primary and secondary prevention of IPV. Further support should be given to the replication and scale up of SASA! and other similar interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 825
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   An intimate partner violence prevention intervention for men, women, and couples in Ethiopia: Additional findings on substance use and depressive symptoms from a cluster-randomized controlled trial [J].
Leight, Jessica ;
Deyessa, Negussie ;
Verani, Fabio ;
Tewolde, Samuel ;
Sharma, Vandana .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (08)
[22]   Risk factors for intimate partner violence in women in the Rakai Community Cohort Study, Uganda, from 2000 to 2009 [J].
Kouyoumdjian, Fiona G. ;
Calzavara, Liviana M. ;
Bondy, Susan J. ;
O'Campo, Patricia ;
Serwadda, David ;
Nalugoda, Fred ;
Kagaayi, Joseph ;
Kigozi, Godfrey ;
Wawer, Maria ;
Gray, Ronald .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
[23]   Effects of a violence prevention intervention in schools and surrounding communities: Secondary analysis of a cluster randomised-controlled trial in Uganda [J].
Merrill, Katherine G. ;
Knight, Louise ;
Namy, Sophie ;
Allen, Elizabeth ;
Naker, Dipak ;
Devries, Karen M. .
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2018, 84 :182-195
[24]   Experiences of Health and Health Care Among Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: Qualitative Findings From Germany [J].
Larsen, Mandi M. ;
Krohn, Julia ;
Pueschel, Klaus ;
Seifert, Dragana .
HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 35 (04) :359-379
[25]   Protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of a preschool-based capacity building intervention on intimate partner violence and substance misuse in Sri Lanka [J].
Lokuge, Kamalini ;
Wallace, Polly ;
Subasinghe, Kalini ;
Thurber, Katherine ;
De Silva, Tissa ;
Clarke, Naomi ;
Waas, Dulshika ;
Liyanage, Nisansala ;
Attygalle, Udena ;
Carron-Arthur, Bradley ;
Rodrigo, Kalyana ;
Banks, Emily ;
D'Este, Cate ;
Rajapakse, Thilini .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18
[26]   Effectiveness of a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission among men, women, and couples in rural Ethiopia: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial [J].
Sharma, Vandana ;
Leight, Jessica ;
Verani, Fabio ;
Tewolde, Samuel ;
Deyessa, Negussie .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (08)
[27]   Effect of Type and Severity of Intimate Partner Violence on Women's Health and Service Use: Findings From a Primary Care Trial of Women Afraid of Their Partners [J].
Hegarty, Kelsey L. ;
O'Doherty, Lorna J. ;
Chondros, Patty ;
Valpied, Jodie ;
Taft, Angela J. ;
Astbury, Jill ;
Brown, Stephanie J. ;
Gold, Lisa ;
Taket, Ann ;
Feder, Gene S. ;
Gunn, Jane M. .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2013, 28 (02) :273-294
[28]   Women's entrepreneurship and intimate partner violence: A cluster randomized trial of microenterprise assistance and partner participation in post-conflict Uganda (SSM-D-14-01580R1) [J].
Green, Eric P. ;
Blattman, Christopher ;
Jamison, Julian ;
Annan, Jeannie .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2015, 133 :177-188
[29]   A nurse-delivered, clinic-based intervention to address intimate partner violence among low-income women in Mexico City: findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial [J].
Gupta, Jhumka ;
Falb, Kathryn L. ;
Ponta, Oriana ;
Xuan, Ziming ;
Campos, Paola Abril ;
Gomez, Annabel Arellano ;
Valades, Jimena ;
Carino, Gisele ;
Olavarrieta, Claudia Diaz .
BMC MEDICINE, 2017, 15
[30]   MOSAIC (MOthers' Advocates In the Community): protocol and sample description of a cluster randomised trial of mentor mother support to reduce intimate partner violence among pregnant or recent mothers [J].
Taft, Angela J. ;
Small, Rhonda ;
Hegarty, Kelsey L. ;
Lumley, Judith ;
Watson, Lyndsey F. ;
Gold, Lisa .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 9