Effects of phantom volume and shape on the accuracy of MRI BANG gel closimetry using BANG3™

被引:26
作者
MacDougall, N. D. [1 ,2 ]
Miquel, M. E. [1 ,2 ]
Keevil, S. F. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts & London NHS Trust, London EC1A 7BE, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Div Imaging Sci, London SE1 9RT, England
[3] Guys Hosp, Dept Med Phys, London SE1 9RT, England
[4] St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London SE1 9RT, England
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr/71353258
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Complex radiotherapy techniques call for three-dimensional dosimetric methods with high spatial resolution. Radiation-sensitive polymer gel systems (e.g. commercially available BANG (TM) gel), read using MRI T-2 mapping, offer a promising solution. A series of calibration test tubes is traditionally used to calculate the dose delivered to a larger, differently shaped volume of gel. In this work, we investigated the implicit assumption that the sensitivity of the gel is independent of shape and size. Phantoms of different shapes and volumes, and 20 glass test-tubes, were filled with BANG3 (TM) gel. T-2 mapping of gels was performed pre- and post-irradiation using a 32 echo Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence and single exponential fitting. Gel irradiation was performed with a 6 MV Varian 6EX linear accelerator. The T-2 values of both nonirradiated and irradiated gels varied with container volume. For containers of the same shape receiving the same radiation dose, larger volumes exhibited a lower T-2 value than did smaller volumes. Containers of the same volume but different shape also showed a smaller variation in response to radiation. The greatest difference in T-2 values at the same dose was seen between test-tubes and larger volumes. This would imply that if test-tubes alone are used to calibrate larger volumes, then up to a 35% error could be introduced into radiotherapy plan verification. This can be reduced to <10% error if the gel volume is normalized with an external measurement device. Consequently, the traditional test-tube calibration method would be unacceptable for clinical plan verification.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 50
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
*DOSGEL, 2004, J PHYS C SERIES, V3, P228
[2]  
FARAJOLLAHI AR, 2001, P 2 INT WORKSH RAD T
[3]   Polymer gels for magnetic resonance imaging of radiation dose distributions at normal room atmosphere [J].
Fong, PM ;
Keil, DC ;
Does, MD ;
Gore, JC .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (12) :3105-3113
[4]   Three-dimensional visualization and measurement of conformal dose distributions using magnetic resonance imaging of BANG polymer gel dosimeters [J].
Ibbott, GS ;
Maryanski, MJ ;
Eastman, P ;
Holcomb, SD ;
Zhang, YS ;
Avison, RG ;
Sanders, M ;
Gore, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (05) :1097-1103
[5]  
*IPEM, 2006, BAL COSTS BEN CHECK
[6]   CODE OF PRACTICE FOR HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON THERAPY DOSIMETRY BASED ON THE NPL ABSORBED DOSE CALIBRATION SERVICE [J].
LILLICRAP, SC ;
OWEN, B ;
WILLIAMS, JR ;
WILLIAMS, PC .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (10) :1355-1360
[7]   Evaluation of polymer gels and MRI as a 3-D dosimeter for intensity-modulated radiation therapy [J].
Low, DA ;
Dempsey, JF ;
Venkatesan, R ;
Mutic, S ;
Markman, J ;
Haacke, EM ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (08) :1542-1551
[8]   A systematic review of the precision and accuracy of dose measurements in photon radiotherapy using polymer and Fricke MRI gel dosimetry [J].
MacDougall, N ;
Pitchford, WG ;
Smith, MA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (20) :R107-R121
[9]   Evaluation of the dosimetric performance of BANG3® polymer [J].
MacDougall, ND ;
Miquel, ME ;
Wilson, DJ ;
Keevil, SF ;
Smith, MA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (08) :1717-1726
[10]  
MACDOUGALL ND, 2004, P 12 ISMRM ANN M 200