The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research

被引:314
作者
Rezvan, Panteha Hayati [1 ]
Lee, Katherine J. [2 ,3 ]
Simpson, Julie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol & Biostat Unit, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Missing data; Multiple imputation; Sensitivity analysis; Reporting; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; PRIMARY-CARE; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; MISSING DATA; ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; COLLABORATIVE ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-015-0022-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Missing data are common in medical research, which can lead to a loss in statistical power and potentially biased results if not handled appropriately. Multiple imputation (MI) is a statistical method, widely adopted in practice, for dealing with missing data. Many academic journals now emphasise the importance of reporting information regarding missing data and proposed guidelines for documenting the application of MI have been published. This review evaluated the reporting of missing data, the application of MI including the details provided regarding the imputation model, and the frequency of sensitivity analyses within the MI framework in medical research articles. Methods: A systematic review of articles published in the Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine between January 2008 and December 2013 in which MI was implemented was carried out. Results: We identified 103 papers that used MI, with the number of papers increasing from 11 in 2008 to 26 in 2013. Nearly half of the papers specified the proportion of complete cases or the proportion with missing data by each variable. In the majority of the articles (86%) the imputed variables were specified. Of the 38 papers (37%) that stated the method of imputation, 20 used chained equations, 8 used multivariate normal imputation, and 10 used alternative methods. Very few articles (9%) detailed how they handled non-normally distributed variables during imputation. Thirty-nine papers (38%) stated the variables included in the imputation model. Less than half of the papers (46%) reported the number of imputations, and only two papers compared the distribution of imputed and observed data. Sixty-six papers presented the results from MI as a secondary analysis. Only three articles carried out a sensitivity analysis following MI to assess departures from the missing at random assumption, with details of the sensitivity analyses only provided by one article. Conclusions: This review outlined deficiencies in the documenting of missing data and the details provided about imputation. Furthermore, only a few articles performed sensitivity analyses following MI even though this is strongly recommended in guidelines. Authors are encouraged to follow the available guidelines and provide information on missing data and the imputation process.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A review of the use of controlled multiple imputation in randomised controlled trials with missing outcome data [J].
Ping-Tee Tan ;
Suzie Cro ;
Eleanor Van Vogt ;
Matyas Szigeti ;
Victoria R. Cornelius .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
[22]   A review of the use of controlled multiple imputation in randomised controlled trials with missing outcome data [J].
Tan, Ping-Tee ;
Cro, Suzie ;
Van Vogt, Eleanor ;
Szigeti, Matyas ;
Cornelius, Victoria R. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
[23]   A Simplified Framework for Using Multiple Imputation in Social Work Research [J].
Rose, Roderick A. ;
Fraser, Mark W. .
SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (03) :171-178
[24]   A semiparametric multiply robust multiple imputation method for causal inference [J].
Gochanour, Benjamin ;
Chen, Sixia ;
Beebe, Laura ;
Haziza, David .
METRIKA, 2023, 86 (05) :517-542
[25]   On the Use of Multiple Imputation Approach in Pediatric Research [J].
Chen, Sixia ;
Anderson, Michael P. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 272
[26]   A Multiple Imputation Method for Sensitivity Analyses of Time-to-Event Data with Possibly Informative Censoring [J].
Zhao, Yue ;
Herring, Amy H. ;
Zhou, Haibo ;
Ali, Mirza W. ;
Koch, Gary G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 24 (02) :229-253
[27]   Multiple imputation of missing at random data: General points and presentation of a Monte-Carlo method [J].
Cottrell, G. ;
Cot, M. ;
Mary, J. -Y. .
REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2009, 57 (05) :361-372
[28]   Multiple imputation as a flexible tool for missing data handling in clinical research [J].
Enders, Craig K. .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2017, 98 :4-18
[29]   Multiple Imputation: A Review of Practical and Theoretical Findings [J].
Murray, Jared S. .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 33 (02) :142-159
[30]   Flexible, Free Software for Multilevel Multiple Imputation: A Review of Blimp and jomo [J].
Hayes, Timothy .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2019, 44 (05) :625-641