Embodied Energy: Soil Retaining Geosystems

被引:25
作者
Soga, Kenichi [1 ]
Chau, Chris [1 ]
Nicholson, Duncan [2 ]
Pantelidou, Heleni [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[2] Arup Geotech, London, England
关键词
embodied energy; soil retaining structures; material energy; transportation energy; installation energy; geotechnical design; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1007/s12205-011-0013-7
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Embodied energy is defined as the total energy in joules that can be attributed to bringing an item to its existing state. This paper attempts to quantify the amount of energy that is put into constructing geotechnical structures. In this study, several common retaining wall options are designed for (i) a hypothetical highway widening project based on a typical condition in London, (ii) basement construction of actual high rise buildings in London and (iii) embankments and cuttings as part of an actual highway road widening project. The embodied energy of each design was computed. Results show that the largest variance on embodied energy is the design solutions and within a given design the materials energy dominates over the installation energy and the transportation energy. The choice of Embodied Energy Intensity (EEI) of materials, particularly steel and concrete, is shown to have a large influence on the magnitude of embodied energy. When comparing among different designs of soil retaining structures, a recycled steel wall system generally has less embodied energy than the equivalent concrete wall system, which is more efficient than the equivalent virgin steel system. Results of the three case studies collectively indicate that minimizing materials usage is the key for reducing embodied energy in soil retention projects.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 749
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Architectural Institute of Japan, 2003, GUID LIF ASS BUILD
[2]  
BS8002, 1994, BS8002 BRIT STAND I
[3]  
Chau C., 2006, Proceedings of International Conference on Reuse of Foundations for Urban Sites, P277
[4]  
Chau C., 2008, GeoCongress 2008: Geosustainability and Geohazard Mitigation, P867
[5]  
Chau C. Y. K., 2011, P ICE GEOT IN PRESS
[6]   Life-cycle energy use in office buildings [J].
Cole, RJ ;
Kernan, PC .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 31 (04) :307-317
[7]   Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study [J].
Fay, R ;
Treloar, G ;
Iyer-Raniga, U .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2000, 28 (01) :31-41
[8]   Decision-Support Tool for Assessing the Environmental Effects of Constructing Commercial Buildings [J].
Guggemos, Angela Acree ;
Horvath, Arpad .
JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 12 (04) :187-195
[9]  
Hammond G. P., 2008, INVENTORY EMBODIED C
[10]  
Howard N, 2000, BRE METHODOLOGY ENV