Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in solid thyroid nodules with and without enhancement

被引:60
作者
Wu, Qiong [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
Hu, Bing [1 ]
He, Zhi-Yan [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Inst Ultrasound Med, Dept Ultrasound Med, Affiliated Peoples Hosp 6, 600 Yishan Rd, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Peoples Hosp 1, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Thyroid nodules; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Conventional ultrasound; Sonographic features; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; LESIONS; CEUS; DIFFERENTIATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; DOPPLER; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s12020-015-0850-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We aimed to investigate different enhancement patterns of solid thyroid nodules on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and then to evaluate the corresponding diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign and malignant nodules with and without enhancement. 229 solid thyroid nodules in 196 patients who had undergone both conventional ultrasound and CEUS examinations were classified into enhancement and non-enhancement groups. Besides, different enhancement patterns in the enhancement group were characterised with five indicators including arrival time, mode of entrance, echo intensity, homogeneity, and washout time. Then aforementioned indicators were compared between benign and malignant nodules of different sizes (< 10 mm and > 10 mm), and diagnostic performance of significant enhancement indicators was calculated. As for the enhancement group, there were statistically significant differences of < 10 mm subgroup among three CEUS indicators including arrival time, mode of entrance, and washout time between malignant and benign thyroid nodules (p < 0.05), while all CEUS indicators showed statistically significant differences in the total group and a parts per thousand yen10 mm subgroup (p < 0.05). All the five CEUS indicators displayed better diagnostic performance with specificity (92.86, 92.14, 95.71, 90.71, and 90.71 %, respectively) and diagnostic accuracy (80.79, 79.48, 74.67, 75.11, and 81.66 %, respectively), while the sensitivity and negative predictive value of non-enhancement were 95.51 and 95.83 %, respectively, with an accuracy of 77.29 %. CEUS is a very promising diagnostic technique that could improve the diagnostic accuracy of identifying benign thyroid lesions to spare a large number of patients an unnecessary invasive procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 488
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Thyroid nodules: risk stratification for malignancy with ultrasound and guided biopsy
    Anil, Gopinathan
    Hegde, Amogh
    Chong, F. H. Vincent
    [J]. CANCER IMAGING, 2011, 11 (01): : 209 - 223
  • [2] [Anonymous], OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NEC
  • [3] Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial results
    Bartolotta, Tommaso Vincenzo
    Midiri, Massimo
    Galia, Massimo
    Runza, Giuseppe
    Attard, Marco
    Savoia, Giovanni
    Lagalla, Roberto
    Cardinale, Adelfio Elio
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (10) : 2234 - 2241
  • [4] Growing indications for CEUS: The kidney, testis, lymph nodes, thyroid, prostate, and small bowel
    Cantisani, V.
    Bertolotto, M.
    Weskott, H. P.
    Romanini, L.
    Grazhdani, H.
    Passamonti, M.
    Drudi, F. M.
    Malpassini, F.
    Isidori, A.
    Meloni, F. M.
    Calliada, F.
    D'Ambrosio, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (09) : 1675 - 1684
  • [5] Prospective comparative evaluation of quantitative-elastosonography (Q-elastography) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: Preliminary experience
    Cantisani, V.
    Consorti, F.
    Guerrisi, A.
    Guerrisi, I.
    Ricci, P.
    Di Segni, M.
    Mancuso, E.
    Scardella, L.
    Milazzo, F.
    D'Ambrosio, F.
    Antonaci, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (11) : 1892 - 1898
  • [6] Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging, and Their Combined Use in Differentiating Focal Solid Thyroid Nodules
    Deng, Jin
    Zhou, Ping
    Tian, Shuang-ming
    Zhang, Lu
    Li, Jia-le
    Qian, Ying
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [7] Ferrari F S, 2008, J Ultrasound, V11, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.jus.2008.03.004
  • [8] Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement
    Frates, MC
    Benson, CB
    Charboneau, JW
    Cibas, ES
    Clark, OH
    Coleman, BG
    Cronan, JJ
    Doubilet, PM
    Evans, DB
    Goellner, JR
    Hay, ID
    Hertzberg, BS
    Intenzo, CM
    Jeffrey, RB
    Langer, JE
    Larsen, PR
    Mandel, SJ
    Middleton, WD
    Reading, CC
    Sherman, SI
    Tessier, FN
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) : 794 - 800
  • [9] Real-time Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Thyroid Nodules
    Friedrich-Rust, M.
    Sperber, A.
    Holzer, K.
    Diener, J.
    Gruenwald, F.
    Badenhoop, K.
    Weber, S.
    Kriener, S.
    Herrmann, E.
    Bechstein, W. O.
    Zeuzem, S.
    Bojunga, J.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2010, 118 (09) : 602 - 609
  • [10] Diagnostic performance of elastography in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules
    Garino, Francesca
    Deandrea, Maurilio
    Motta, Manuela
    Mormile, Alberto
    Ragazzoni, Federico
    Palestini, Nicola
    Freddi, Milena
    Gasparri, Guido
    Sgotto, Enrico
    Pacchioni, Donatella
    Limone, Paolo Piero
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2015, 49 (01) : 175 - 183