Evaluating the Efficiency of Water Distribution Network Sectors Using the DEA-Weight Russell Directional Distance Model: The Case of the City of Valencia (Spain)

被引:6
作者
Palomero-Gonzalez, Jose Antonio [1 ]
Almenar-Llongo, Vicent [2 ]
Fuentes-Pascual, Ramon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Grp Global Omnium, Inst Interuniv Desarrollo Local, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Catolica Univ Valencia, Dept Econ, Valencia 46003, Spain
[3] Univ Alicante, Dept Analisis Econ Aplicado, Alicante 03080, Spain
关键词
water scarcity; water management; water efficiency; water distribution sectors; DEA-WRDDM; URBAN WATER; SEWERAGE COMPANIES; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; TREATMENT PLANTS; SUPPLY SERVICES; CHILEAN WATER; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.3390/su131910546
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In many cities, sectorization projects of the drinking water distribution network have been implemented. This study provides a methodology to evaluate the efficiency of the sectors of a water distribution network by applying a data envelopment analysis weighted Russell directional distance (DEA-WRDD) model. This non-radial DEA model gives the overall efficiency of each unit of analysis, as well as each input, output, and undesirable output considered in the evaluation. The variables used in the analysis provide a multidisciplinary view: economic factors (covering costs), water quality parameters, and technical aspects. The empirical analysis was performed for the sectors of the water distribution network of the city of Valencia (Spain) for the year 2016. In this particular case, the results showed that approximately half of the sectors were efficient. The efficiency values of each variable indicate that the main challenges (faced by the water distribution company) were the optimization of maintenance costs and the reduction of leaks, both of which have an impact on the quality of the distributed water. So, the purpose of this article is to highlight the usefulness of efficiency analysis to help the decision making of managers of sectorized water distribution networks so that they can optimize the management.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]   The performance of the urban water and wastewater sectors in Australia [J].
Abbott, Malcolm ;
Cohen, Bruce ;
Wang, Wei Chun .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2012, 20 (01) :52-63
[2]   Operational Efficiency of Mexican Water Utilities: Results of a Double-Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis [J].
Ablanedo-Rosas, Jose Humberto ;
Guerrero Campanur, Aaron ;
Olivares-Benitez, Elias ;
Sanchez-Garcia, Jacqueline Y. ;
Enrique Nunez-Rios, Juan .
WATER, 2020, 12 (02)
[3]   The performance of water utilities in Jordan [J].
Al-Assa'd, Tamer ;
Sauer, Johannes .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 62 (04) :803-808
[5]   The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: Non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output [J].
Barros, Carlos Pestana ;
Managi, Shunsuke ;
Matousek, Roman .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01) :1-8
[6]   The efficiency of public services in small municipalities: The case of drinking water supply [J].
Benito, Bernardino ;
Faura, Ursula ;
Guillamon, Maria-Dolores ;
Rios, Ana-Maria .
CITIES, 2019, 93 :95-103
[7]   Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: a benchmarking literature survey [J].
Berg, Sanford V. ;
Marques, Rui Cunha .
WATER POLICY, 2011, 13 (05) :591-606
[8]   Energy and Environmental Efficiency of China's Transportation Sector: A Multidirectional Analysis Approach [J].
Bi, Gongbing ;
Wang, Pingchun ;
Yang, Feng ;
Liang, Liang .
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 2014
[9]   Efficiency evaluation for regional urban water use and wastewater decontamination systems in China: A DEA approach [J].
Bian, Yiwen ;
Yan, Shuai ;
Xu, Hao .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 83 :15-23
[10]   Particle accumulation rate of drinking water distribution systems determined by incoming turbidity [J].
Blokker, E. J. M. ;
Schaap, P. G. .
COMPUTING AND CONTROL FOR THE WATER INDUSTRY (CCWI2015): SHARING THE BEST PRACTICE IN WATER MANAGEMENT, 2015, 119 :290-298