Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials I of the clinical effectiveness of impervious plastic wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery

被引:29
作者
Kang, Sung Il [1 ]
Oh, Heung-Kwon [1 ]
Kim, Min Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Myung Jo [1 ]
Kim, Duck-Woo [1 ]
Kim, Hyung Jin
Kang, Sung-Bum [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Surg, Seongnam, South Korea
关键词
COLORECTAL SURGERY; EDGE PROTECTOR; CARE BUNDLES; RING DRAPE; PREVENTION; CONTAMINATION; REDUCTION; DEVICES; COST; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.024
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgical site infections are a common postoperative complication after abdominal surgery. Although impervious plastic wound protectors have been used in surgery to reduce surgical site infection rates, the effectiveness of impervious plastic wound protectors for reduction of surgical site infections remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the clinical effectiveness of impervious plastic wound protectors in reducing surgical site infection rates after abdominal surgery. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating surgical site infection risk after abdominal surgeries with and without the use of impervious ilastic wound protectors. The outcome of interest was a well specified, clinically based definition of surgical site infections. No language or time restrictions were applied. The pooled risk ratio was estimated with random-effect meta-analysis. The quality assessment of the studies and the quantitative analyses were performed in line with the principles of the Cochrane Collaboration. Results: Of the 400 studies identified, 14 randomized controlled trials representing 2,684 patients were included in this review. The pooled risk ratio under a random-effects model was 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.96; I-2, 56.8%), indicating a potentially significant benefit from impervious plastic wound protector use. There was a significant trend toward greater protective effect in studies using a dual ring protector (relative risk = 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.58), rather than a single ring protector (relative risk = 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.00). There was no significant between-study heterogeneity or publication bias. Conclusion: This study suggests that impervious plastic wound protectors are efficient in reducing surgical site infection rates in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 945
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]   Ring drape do not protect against surgical site infections in colorectal surgery: a randomised controlled study [J].
Baier, Peter ;
Kiesel, Marina ;
Kayser, Carolin ;
Fischer, Andreas ;
Hopt, Ulrich T. ;
Utzolino, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (09) :1223-1228
[3]  
BATZ W, 1987, AKTUEL CHIR, V22, P149
[4]   Hospital costs associated with surgical site infections in general and vascular surgery patients [J].
Boltz, Melissa M. ;
Hollenbeak, Christopher S. ;
Julian, Kathleen G. ;
Ortenzi, Gail ;
Dillon, Peter W. .
SURGERY, 2011, 150 (05) :934-942
[5]   ALEXIS O-Ring wound retractor vs conventional wound protection for the prevention of surgical site infections in colorectal resections [J].
Cheng, K. P. ;
Roslani, A. C. ;
Sehha, N. ;
Kueh, J. H. ;
Law, C. W. ;
Chong, H. Y. ;
Arumugam, K. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (06) :E346-E351
[6]   Wound Protectors Reduce Surgical Site Infection A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Edwards, Janet P. ;
Ho, Adelyn L. ;
Tee, May C. ;
Dixon, Elijah ;
Ball, Chad G. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (01) :53-59
[7]  
Gamble S S, 1984, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V29, P232
[8]   Systematic Review of the Clinical Effectiveness of Wound-edge Protection Devices in Reducing Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery [J].
Gheorghe, Adrian ;
Calvert, Melanie ;
Pinkney, Thomas D. ;
Fletcher, Benjamin R. ;
Bartlett, David C. ;
Hawkins, William J. ;
Mak, Tony ;
Youssef, Haney ;
Wilson, Sue .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (06) :1017-1029
[9]  
Higgins JP., 2011, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V343, P5928, DOI [10.1136/bmj.d5928, DOI 10.1136/BMJ.D5928]
[10]   Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) :1539-1558