Multimorbidity, the Predominant Predictor of Quality-of-Life, Following Successful Spinal Cord Stimulation for Angina Pectoris

被引:5
|
作者
Jitta, Djike Josephus [2 ]
DeJongste, Mike J. L. [1 ]
Kliphuis, Cor M. [3 ]
Staal, Michiel J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Thoraxctr, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2011年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Angina pectoris; morbidity; neuromodulation; quality of life; spinal cord stimulation; CHRONIC REFRACTORY ANGINA; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; BLOOD-FLOW; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; PAIN; RELIEF; WOMEN; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1403.2010.00321.x
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Patients suffering from severe chronic angina pectoris (AP) that has become therapeutically refractory to medication and revascularization can be adequately treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS). However, following SCS implantation for angina, not all patients show a consistent improvement in quality of life (QoL). Therefore, we sought to study the association of baseline characteristics and chronic multimorbidities on QoL following SCS implantation. Materials and Methods: All patients treated with SCS for refractory AP (rAP) were registered in a local data base. Patients who had discontinued SCS therapy were excluded from further analysis. Baseline characteristics, such as exercise limiting morbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], rheumatic disease, diabetes mellitus [DM], obesity expressed as body mass index [BMI] > 25) and demographic data, were retrieved from the data base. QoL was studied using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the RAND-36 questionnaire. Results: During a 21-year registration period (1986-2008), we enlisted 127 patients with SCS for rAP in our data base. Eighty-two, of whom 59 died, had discontinued SCS and were lost to follow-up. Out of the remaining 45 patients, 33 returned their questionnaires (73.3%). At SCS implantation, 72.7% of the patients were male, mean age 58 +/- 8.5 years. Twenty-four patients were in class III-IV angina and nine in class II-III NYHA. After a follow-up of 6.4 +/- 4.1 years, men had better physical capacity and experienced less impairment in QoL resulting from physical or emotional restrictions (all p < 0.05) compared with women. Patients without COPD reported a better general health compared with those with rAP and COPD (p < 0.05). The association of DM on QoL was borderline significant. Patients with lower BMI scored better on emotional well-being and perception of disease than those with a higher BMI (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05, respectively). None of the patients reported other morbidities limiting their exercise. Conclusions: Men showed a larger improvement in QoL following SCS implantation, compared with women. As SCS improves rAP, other chronic morbidities such as COPD, DM, and BMI may become the limiting factors for exercise and subsequently adversely affect QoL following implantation of an SCS system. As a consequence of the present relatively small single-center study, we recommend studies regarding rAP and SCS to also address the effect of comorbidities on outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of spinal cord stimulation on quality of life in patients with therapeutically chronic refractory angina pectoris
    Vulink, NCC
    Overgaauw, DM
    Jessurun, GAJ
    TenVaarwerk, IAM
    Kropmans, TJB
    van der Schans, CP
    Middel, B
    Staal, MJ
    DeJongste, MJL
    NEUROMODULATION, 1999, 2 (01): : 33 - 40
  • [2] Management of Angina Pectoris The Role of Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Eckert, Siegfried
    Horstkotte, Dieter
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2009, 9 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [3] Spinal cord stimulation in severe angina pectoris
    Augustinsson, LE
    Eliasson, T
    Mannheimer, C
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 65 (1-4) : 136 - 141
  • [4] Unstable angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
    Akbas, Mert
    Yegin, Arif
    Yilmaz, Huseyin
    Altekin, R. Emre
    Sabit, Muhammed Jamil
    Sanli, Suat
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2015, 19 (03) : 383 - 385
  • [5] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris
    Lee, Seong Heon
    Jeong, Hye Jin
    Jeong, Sin Ho
    Lee, Hyung Gon
    Choi, Jeong Il
    Yoon, Myung Ha
    Kim, Woong Mo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 25 (02) : 121 - 125
  • [6] Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of angina pectoris
    Aronow W.S.
    Frishman W.H.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2004, 6 (1) : 79 - 83
  • [7] Cervical spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of severe angina pectoris
    González-Darder, JM
    González-Martínez, V
    Canela-Moya, P
    NEUROSURGERY QUARTERLY, 1998, 8 (01) : 16 - 23
  • [8] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Medically Refractory Angina Pectoris: Can the Therapy Be Resuscitated?
    Levy, Robert M.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2011, 14 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [9] Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
    Vervaat, F. E.
    van der Gaag, A.
    van Suijlekom, H.
    Botman, C. J.
    Teeuwen, K.
    Wijnbergen, I.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 28 (09) : 478 - 484
  • [10] Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris
    Tykocki, Tomasz
    Guzek, Krystyna
    Mandat, Tomasz
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2011, 69 (04) : 383 - 387