Probability Analysis of Deep Tunnels Based on Monte Carlo Simulation: Case Study of Diversion Tunnels at Jinping II Hydropower Station, Southwest China

被引:5
|
作者
Tu, Hongliang [1 ]
Zhou, Hui [1 ]
Gao, Yang [1 ]
Lu, Jingjing [1 ]
Singh, Hemant Kumar [1 ]
Zhang, Chuanqing [1 ]
Hu, Dawei [1 ]
Hu, Mingming [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Rock & Soil Mech, State Key Lab Geomech & Geotech Engn, Wuhan 430071, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Jinping II hydropower station; Deep-buried diversion tunnel; Field monitoring; Probability analysis; Monte Carlo method; RADIAL SUBGRADE MODULUS; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; ROCK BRITTLENESS; MASS; SOIL;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002146
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
During the construction of deep-buried diversion tunnels, many uncertainties exist in the variables governing the safety of the support structure, which will affect the safety of the tunnel. Therefore, the probability analysis of the deep tunnel based on Monte Carlo simulation is analyzed. For that a case study of diversion tunnels at Jinping II hydropower station, southwestern China is selected and analyzed. First, the dispersions of geostress and marble mechanical parameters are studied based on the field monitoring of the bolt stress and the laboratory testing of the Jinping marble. Subsequently, the statistical characteristics of the radial subgrade modulus are obtained considering the 100,000-fold sampling. Finally, the influence of the main uncertain factors on the internal force and deformation of the supporting structure is examined through the establishment of a numerical model. The maximum bending moment and axial force appear in the vault and invert of the tunnel, respectively. When the design requires the reliability of the tunnel support structure to achieve 90% in the case of Jinping II hydropower station, the value of the bending moment and the axial force cannot be higher than 0.57 MPa and 8.0 MN, respectively. The factors those having a greater impact on the safety of the tunnel support structure are the vertical load and the radial subgrade modulus.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [11] Tempo-spatial characteristics and influential factors of rockburst: a case study of transportation and drainage tunnels in Jinping II hydropower station
    Liu, Lipeng
    Wang, Xiaogang
    Zhang, Yizhong
    Jia, Zhixin
    Duan, Qingwei
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 3 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [12] Rockburst Prediction From the Perspective of Energy Release: A Case Study of a Diversion Tunnel at Jinping II Hydropower Station
    Fan, Yong
    Cui, Xianze
    Leng, Zhendong
    Zheng, Junwei
    Wang, Feng
    Xu, Xiaole
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [13] The Application of Monte Carlo Simulation in Present Earning Value Method ---Case Study of a Medium Hydropower Station
    Zhang, Ailan
    Wang, Songjiang
    THERMAL, POWER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 732-733 : 731 - 737
  • [14] Market risk Analysis to Hydropower Project Based on Monte Carlo Method-Case Study of Xiluodu Hydropower Station in Sichuan Province
    Li, Ziyi
    Wang, Songjiang
    ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-4, 2012, 472-475 : 1437 - 1440
  • [15] Research on risk assessment system for water inrush in the karst tunnel construction based on GIS: Case study on the diversion tunnel groups of the Jinping II Hydropower Station
    Li, Xueping
    Li, Yunan
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 40 : 182 - 191
  • [16] Prediction of the Tunnel Collapse Probability Using SVR-Based Monte Carlo Simulation: A Case Study
    Meng, Guowang
    Li, Hongle
    Wu, Bo
    Liu, Guangyang
    Ye, Huazheng
    Zuo, Yiming
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [17] Reliability analysis based on hybrid algorithm of M5 model tree and Monte Carlo simulation for corroded pipelines: Case of study X60 Steel grade pipes
    Ben Seghier, Mohamed El Amine
    Keshtegar, Behrooz
    Correia, Jose A. F. O.
    Lesiule, Grzegorz
    De Jesus, Abilio M. P.
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2019, 97 : 793 - 803