Research trends in online distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:39
作者
Mishra, Sanjaya [1 ]
Sahoo, Sidhartha [2 ]
Pandey, Shriram [3 ]
机构
[1] Commonwealth Learning, Elearning, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[2] Banaras Hindu Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Indian Natl Ctr Ocean Informat, Hyderabad, India
关键词
e-learning; emergency remote teaching; online distance education; COVID-19; SARS-COV-2; COCITATION ANALYSIS; MAPPING RESEARCH; EDUCATION; PUBLICATIONS; CITATION; COLLABORATION; BIBLIOMETRICS; PATTERNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/01587919.2021.1986373
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Online distance learning emerged as a solution to continue with teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to more scholarly publications in the field. The current study critically analyzed the publications using a range of scientometric techniques. The journal article was the predominant form of publication, and collaborative research work was preferred by scholars in this domain. The most-cited articles were published primarily in interdisciplinary journals. Most of the papers (43.64%) used quantitative methods, followed by qualitative methods (13.33%), and mixed methods (9.09%). A large proportion of publications (33%) did not indicate a research methodology. Visualizations of research show that the field has focused largely on remote teaching as a new term to depict online distance learning but has also covered a wider spectrum of issues in relation to teaching and learning, with an emphasis on technologies for teaching and learning, assessment, teacher capacities, and institutional preparedness.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 519
页数:26
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Amoozegar A., 2018, International Journal of Information Research and Review, V5, P5352
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment
[4]   Irrelevant, Overlooked, or Lost? Trends in 20 Years of Uncited and Low-cited K-12 Online Learning Articles [J].
Arnesen, Karen ;
Walters, Shea ;
Borup, Jered ;
Barbour, Michael K. .
ONLINE LEARNING, 2020, 24 (02) :187-206
[5]  
Berge L.B., 2001, AM J DISTANCE EDUC, V15, P5, DOI DOI 10.1080/08923640109527090
[6]  
Bond M., 2020, Asian Journal of Distance Education, V15, P191, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.4425683
[7]   Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors? [J].
Bonk, Curtis J. .
DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2020, 41 (04) :589-599
[8]   Co-Citation Analysis, Bibliographic Coupling, and Direct Citation: Which Citation Approach Represents the Research Front Most Accurately? [J].
Boyack, Kevin W. ;
Klavans, Richard .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (12) :2389-2404
[9]  
Bozkurt A, 2021, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V22, P19
[10]  
Bozkurt Aras., 2020, Asian Journal of Distance Education, V15, P1, DOI [DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3878572, 10.5281/ zenodo.3878572, 10.5281/zenodo.3878572]