Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in preeclamptic patients

被引:37
|
作者
Alper, Arnold B.
Yi, Yeonjoo
Webber, Larry S.
Pridjian, Gabriella
Mumuney, Abimbola Aina
Saade, George
Morgan, Jamie
Nuwayhid, Bahij
Belfort, Michael
Puschett, Jules
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Nephrol Sect, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[3] Tulane Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Dept Biostat, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX USA
[6] Texas Tech El Paso Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, El Paso, TX USA
[7] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
preeclampsia; glomerular filtration rate; renal function;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-986697
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Accurate estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with preeclampsia is often difficult or impossible to accomplish. In this study, the Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and MDRD2 formulas were evaluated for their accuracy in determining GFR in the setting of preeclampsia. The estimated GFR calculated from these formulas was compared with the creatinine clearance values obtained from a 24-hour urine collection in 209 preeclamptic patients recruited from five large hospitals. Additionally, a set of new equations that more accurately estimate GFR in preeclamptic patients based on ethnicity, preeclampsia GFR (PGFR), was created. Both the CG and MDRD formulas were inaccurate in predicting GFR in preeclamptic patients, and both were significantly less accurate than PGFR. In conclusion, current GFR estimation equations based on serum creatinine values in nonpregnant patients are not reliable measures of renal function in patients with preeclampsia. The use of a new (PGFR) formula is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 574
页数:6
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据