Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:280
|
作者
Johnson, N [1 ]
Barlow, D
Lethaby, A
Tavender, E
Curr, L
Garry, R
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland Hosp, Natl Womens Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] John Radcliffe Hosp, Nuffield Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Cochrane Oral Hlth Grp, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Western Australia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 330卷 / 7506期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1478
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the most appropriate surgical method of hysterectomy (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) for women with benign disease. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, and Biological Abstracts. Selection of studies Only randomised controlled trials were selected; participants had to have benign gynaecological disease; interventions had to comprise at least one hysterectomy method compared with another; and trials had to report primary outcomes (time taken to return to normal activities, intraoperative visceral injury, and major long term complications) or secondary outcomes (operating time, other immediate complications of surgery, short term complications, and duration of hospital stay). Results 27 trials (total of 3643 participants) were included. Return to normal activities was quicker after vaginal than after abdominal hysterectomy (weighted mean difference 9.5 (95% confidence interval 6.4 to 12.6) days) and after laparoscopic than after abdominal hysterectomy (difference 13.6 (11.8 to 15.4)) days, but was not significantly different for laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy (difference -1.1 (-4.2 to 2.1) days). There were more urinary tract injuries with laparoscopic than with abdominal hysterectomy (odds ratio 2.61 (95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.60)), but no other intraoperative visceral injuries showed a significant difference between surgical approaches. Data were notably absent for many important long term patient outcome measures, where the analyses were underpowered to detect important differences, or they were simply not reported in trials. Conclusions Significantly speedier return to normal activities and other improved secondary outcomes (shorter duration of hospital stay and fewer unspecified infections or febrile episodes) suggest that vaginal hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy where possible. Where vaginal hysterectomy is not possible, laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy, although it brings a higher chance of bladder or ureter injury.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1481
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adverse events of exercise therapy in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Niemeijer, Andre
    Lund, Hans
    Stafne, Signe Nilssen
    Ipsen, Thomas
    Goldschmidt, Cathrine Luhaaar
    Jorgensen, Claus Thomas
    Juhl, Carsten B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 54 (18) : 1073 - 1080
  • [22] Thiazolidinediones and risk of bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Azhari, H.
    Haig, C.
    Dawson, J.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 63 (01) : 66 - 66
  • [23] Effects of pistachios on glycaemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hadi, Amir
    Asbaghi, Omid
    Kazemi, Maryam
    Haghighian, Hossein Khadem
    Ghaedi, Ehsan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2023, 129 (10) : 1693 - 1702
  • [24] PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT FOR METHAMPHETAMINE WITHDRAWAL: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Acheson, Liam S.
    Williams, Benjamin H. M.
    Farrell, Michael
    Mcketin, Rebecca
    Ezard, Nadine
    Siefried, Krista J.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2021, 40 : S42 - S43
  • [25] Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Cai, Wenhao
    Liu, Fei
    Wen, Yongjian
    Han, Chenxia
    Prasad, Manya
    Xia, Qing
    Singh, Vikesh K.
    Sutton, Robert
    Huang, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [26] Interventions for carers of stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hall, J.
    Clarke, D.
    Forster, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2016, 11 : S62 - S62
  • [27] Antipsychotic medications for the treatment of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Kishi, Taro
    Hirota, Tomoya
    Matsunaga, Shinji
    Iwata, Nakao
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 87 (07): : 767 - 774
  • [28] Role of honey after tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Lal, A.
    Chohan, K.
    Chohan, A.
    Chakravarti, A.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 42 (03) : 651 - 660
  • [29] Electroacupuncture for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Tan, Jiuqing
    Meng, Fangqi
    Zhang, Baobao
    Deng, Qingwen
    Jiao, Boyu
    Peng, Lizhi
    Ding, Ying
    Ruan, Jingwen
    Zeng, Jingchun
    Pei, Wenya
    Lin, Guohua
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [30] Preoperative celecoxib in noncardiac surgery A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Khan, James S.
    Margarido, Clarita
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Clarke, Hance
    McLellan, Andrea
    Choi, Stephen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (03) : 204 - 214