Recurrent lumbar disc herniation - Results of operative management

被引:235
作者
Suk, KS
Lee, HM
Moon, SH
Kim, NH
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
recurrent lumbar disc herniation; repeat discectomy;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200103150-00024
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A retrospective evaluation of 28 patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Objectives. To analyze the outcome of the revisions (repeat discectomy), the risk factors of recurrent disc herniation, and the factors that influenced the outcomes of repeat discectomy. Summary of Background Data. Recurrent herniation following disc excision has been reported in 5-11% of patients. There have been many studies on recurrent disc herniation, but these studies have analyzed mixed patient populations. Methods. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation was defined as disc herniation at the same level, regardless of ipsilateral or contralateral herniation, with a pain-free interval greater than 6 months. Eight women and 20 men were studied. The levels of disc herniation were L4-L5 (19 cases) and L5-S1 (9 cases). Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all patients. Revision surgery was performed in all patients by using conventional open discectomy. The pain-free interval, side and degree of herniation, operation time, duration of hospital stay, and clinical improvement rate were recorded. Results. The mean pain-free interval was 60.8 months. There were 21 cases of ipsilateral herniation and 7 cases of contralateral herniation. The degrees of herniation in revision were protrusion (14 cases), subligamentous extrusion (3 cases), transligamentous extrusion (8 cases), and sequestration (3 cases). The degrees of herniation in the previous discectomy were protrusion (17 cases), subligamentous extrusion (10 cases), and transligamentous extrusion (1 case). The length of surgery was significantly different (P = 0.003) between the revision surgery and the previous discectomy. There were no significant differences between revision and previous surgery in terms of hospital stay or clinical improvement rates. Age, gender, smoking, professions, traumatic events, level and degree of herniation, and pain-free interval did not affect the clinical outcomes. Conclusion. Conventional open discectomy as a revision surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation showed satisfactory results that were comparable with those of primary discectomy. Based on the results of this study, repeat discectomy can be recommended for the management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 676
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
AN HS, 1994, J SPINAL DISORD, V7, P369
[2]   REPEAT LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY - FACTORS INFLUENCING OUTCOME [J].
BERNARD, TN .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (15) :2196-2200
[3]   Ipsilateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation - A prospective, controlled study [J].
Cinotti, G ;
Roysam, GS ;
Eisenstein, SM ;
Postacchini, F .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1998, 80B (05) :825-832
[4]   Contralateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation - Results of discectomy compared with those in primary herniation [J].
Cinotti, G ;
Gumina, S ;
Giannicola, G ;
Postacchini, F .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (08) :800-806
[5]  
Connolly E S, 1992, Clin Neurosurg, V39, P211
[6]   OBSERVATIONS ON MANAGEMENT OF FAILED SPINAL OPERATIONS [J].
CROCK, HV .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1976, 58 (02) :193-199
[7]  
DAHMEN G, 1980, REZIDIVE NACH LUMBAL, P70
[8]   MICROSURGICAL REOPERATION FOLLOWING LUMBAR-DISK SURGERY - TIMING, SURGICAL FINDINGS, AND OUTCOME IN 92 PATIENTS [J].
EBELING, U ;
KALBARCYK, H ;
REULEN, HJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 70 (03) :397-404
[9]  
EPSTEIN JOSEPH A., 1967, CLIN ORTHOP RELATED RESIN BONE AND BONE MARROW, V52, P169, DOI 10.1097/00003086-196700520-00013
[10]   REOPERATION AFTER LUMBAR DISC SURGERY - RESULTS IN 130 CASES [J].
FANDINO, J ;
BOTANA, C ;
VILADRICH, A ;
GOMEZBUENO, J .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1993, 122 (1-2) :102-104