Determinants of exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) for waiting passengers at bus stops

被引:54
作者
Hess, Daniel Baldwin [1 ]
Ray, Paul David [3 ]
Stinson, Anne E. [2 ]
Park, JiYoung [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[2] Bergmann Associates, Rochester, NY USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Urban Design Project, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
关键词
Particulate matter; Exposure; Pollution; Air quality; Bus shelters; Built environment; Second-hand smoke; PERSONAL EXPOSURE; AIR-POLLUTION; TRANSPORT MICROENVIRONMENTS; STREET; INDOOR; LONDON; PM10; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research evaluates commuter exposure to particulate matter during pre-journey commute segments for passengers waiting at bus stops by investigating 840 min of simultaneous exposure levels, both inside and outside seven bus shelters in Buffalo, New York. A multivariate regression model is used to estimate the relation between exposure to particulate matter (PM2.5 measured in mu g m(-3)) and three vectors of determinants: time and location, physical setting and placement, and environmental factors. Four determinants have a statistically significant effect on particulate matter: time of day, passengers' waiting location, land use near the bus shelter, and the presence of cigarette smoking at the bus shelter. Model results suggest that exposure to PM2.5 inside a bus shelter is 2.63 mu g m(-3) (or 18 percent) higher than exposure outside a bus shelter, perhaps due in part to the presence of cigarette smoking. Morning exposure levels are 6.51 mu g m(-3) (or 52 percent) higher than afternoon levels. Placement of bus stops can affect exposure to particulate matter for those waiting inside and outside of shelters: air samples at bus shelters located in building canyons have higher particulate matter than bus shelters located near open space. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:5174 / 5182
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Determinants of fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK [J].
Adams, HS ;
Nieuwenhuijsen, MJ ;
Colvile, RN .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (27) :4557-4566
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Health and environment
[3]  
BESECKER A, 2009, BUFFALO NEWS 0429
[4]  
Briggs D. J., 2007, ENVIRON INT, V34, P12
[5]   Air pollution and health [J].
Brunekreef, B ;
Holgate, ST .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9341) :1233-1242
[6]   Commuter exposure to particulate matter in public transportation modes in Hong Kong [J].
Chan, LY ;
Lau, WL ;
Lee, SC ;
Chan, CY .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (21) :3363-3373
[7]   Comparison of the TSI model 8520 and Grimm Series 1.108 portable aerosol instruments used to monitor particulate matter in an iron foundry [J].
Cheng, Yu-Hsiang .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE, 2008, 5 (03) :157-168
[8]   Modelling concentrations of airborne primary and secondary PM10 and PM2.5 with the BelEUROS-model in Belgium [J].
Deutsch, Felix ;
Vankerkom, Jean ;
Janssen, Liliane ;
Janssen, Stijn ;
Bencs, Laszlo ;
Van Grieken, Rene ;
Fierens, Frans ;
Dumont, Gerwin ;
Mensink, Clemens .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 217 (3-4) :230-239
[9]  
FAN W, 2002, P 2 MAT SPEC C CAN S
[10]   Black carbon concentrations in California vehicles and estimation of in-vehicle diesel exhaust particulate matter exposures [J].
Fruin, SA ;
Winer, AM ;
Rodes, CE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (25) :4123-4133