What Preoperative Factors Are Associated With Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement and Satisfaction After Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

被引:2
|
作者
Moorthy, Vikaesh [1 ]
Goh, Graham S. [1 ]
Soh, Reuben Chee Cheong [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 20 Coll Rd,Level 4, Singapore 169856, Singapore
关键词
lumbar fusion; lumbar spine; outcomes; minimal clinically important difference; satisfaction; REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SPINE SURGERY; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; PAIN; DECOMPRESSION; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1177/21925682221139816
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study design Prospective cohort study. Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with clinically meaningful improvement, patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment at 2 years follow-up in patients undergoing single-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods Patients who underwent a primary, single-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2006 and 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional spine registry. Baseline characteristics and PROMs including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS), Mental Component Score (SF-36 MCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) back pain, and VAS leg pain were collected preoperatively, at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 2 years. Results A total of 997 patients were included. Multivariate analyses showed that increasing age (OR 1.039, P < .001) and better preoperative ODI (OR .984, P = .018) were associated with achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for VAS Back. Increasing age (OR 1.032, P = .007) and better preoperative VAS Back (OR .783, P < .001) were associated with achieving MCID for VAS Leg. Lower BMI (OR .952, P = .024) and better preoperative ODI (OR .976, P < .001) were associated with achieving MCID for SF-36 PCS. Importantly, a better preoperative SF-36 MCS was associated with MCID attainment for ODI (OR 1.038, P < .001), satisfaction (OR 1.034, P < .001) and expectation fulfilment (OR 1.024, P < .001). Conclusion Patients who were older, have less preoperative disability and better preoperative mental health were significantly more likely to attain clinically meaningful improvement in PROMs and postoperative satisfaction after single-level TLIF. Identification of these factors would aid surgeons in patient selection and surgical counselling for single-level TLIF.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1295
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study
    Yin, Jianjian
    Jiang, Xijia
    Xu, Nanwei
    Nong, Luming
    Jiang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 85 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [2] Smoking Is Associated With Lower Satisfaction in Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Gatoi, Cheryl
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    Gold, Graham S.
    Mohan, Niraj
    Yongqiang, Chen Jerry
    Ling, Zhixing Marcus
    Soh, Reuben C. C.
    Yuc, Wai-Mun
    Guo, Chang-Ming
    Tan, Seang-Beng
    Chen, John Li-Tat
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01): : E19 - E25
  • [3] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Rezk, Essam Moneer Ali
    Elkholy, Ahmed Rizk
    Shamhoot, Ebrahim Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 34 (01)
  • [4] Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [5] The patient acceptable symptom state for the Oswestry Disability Index following single-level lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Goh, Graham S.
    Soh, Reuben Chee Cheong
    Yue, Wai-Mun
    Guo, Chang-Ming
    Tan, Seang-Beng
    Chen, John Li-Tat
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (04) : 598 - 609
  • [6] Does the Predominant Pain Location Influence Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?
    Goh, Graham S.
    Yue, Wai-Mun
    Guo, Chang Ming
    Tan, Seang-Beng
    Chen, John Li-Tat
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01): : E143 - E149
  • [7] Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (21) : E1382 - E1390
  • [8] Comparative Analysis of Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Wiltse Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Approaches for Treating Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Nurmukhametov, Renat
    Dosanov, Medet
    Medetbek, Abakirov
    Ramirez, Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion
    Chavda, Vishal
    Chmutin, Gennady
    Montemurro, Nicola
    SURGERIES, 2023, 4 (04): : 623 - 634
  • [9] Effect of Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease
    Cheng, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Feng
    Zhang, Kai
    Sun, Xiaojiang
    Zhao, Changqing
    Li, Hua
    Li, Yan Michael
    Zhao, Jie
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 109 : E244 - E251
  • [10] Lumbar Alignment and Clinical Outcome after Single Level Asymmetrical Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis with Local Coronal Imbalance
    Takahashi, Toshiyuki
    Hanakita, Junya
    Watanabe, Mizuki
    Kawaoka, Taigo
    Takebe, Noriyoshi
    Kitahara, Takahiro
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2014, 54 (09) : 691 - 697