Screening for malignancy in low back pain patients: a systematic review

被引:48
作者
Henschke, Nicholas [1 ]
Maher, Christopher G. [1 ]
Refshauge, Kathryn M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Physiotherapy, Back Pain Res Grp, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
low back pain; diagnosis; malignancy; red flags;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-007-0412-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To describe the accuracy of clinical features and tests used to screen for malignancy in patients with low back pain. A systematic review was performed on all available records on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL electronic databases. Studies were considered eligible if they investigated a cohort of low back pain patients, used an appropriate reference standard, and reported sufficient data on the diagnostic accuracy of tests. Two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data to calculate positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios. Six studies evaluating 22 different clinical features and tests were identified. The prevalence of malignancy ranged from 0.1 to 3.5%. A previous history of cancer (LR+ = 23.7), elevated ESR (LR+ = 18.0), reduced hematocrit (LR+ = 18.2), and overall clinician judgement (LR+ = 12.1) increased the probability of malignancy when present. A combination of age >= 50 years, a previous history of cancer, unexplained weight loss, and failure to improve after 1 month had a reported sensitivity of 100%. Overall, there was poor reporting of methodological quality items, and very few studies were performed in community primary care settings. Malignancy is rare as a cause of low back pain. The most useful features and tests are a previous history of cancer, elevated ESR, reduced hematocrit, and clinician judgement.
引用
收藏
页码:1673 / 1679
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Bigos S, 1994, ACUTE LOW BACK PROBL
[2]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) :40-44
[3]   Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality [J].
de Vet, HCW ;
van der Weijden, T ;
Muris, JWM ;
Heyrman, J ;
Buntinx, F ;
Knottnerus, JA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 17 (04) :301-306
[4]  
DEVILLE WL, 2002, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V2, P92
[5]   WHAT CAN THE HISTORY AND PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION TELL US ABOUT LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
DEYO, RA ;
RAINVILLE, J ;
KENT, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (06) :760-765
[6]   LUMBAR SPINE FILMS IN PRIMARY CARE - CURRENT USE AND EFFECTS OF SELECTIVE ORDERING CRITERIA [J].
DEYO, RA ;
DIEHL, AK .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 1 (01) :20-25
[7]   CANCER AS A CAUSE OF BACK PAIN - FREQUENCY, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, AND DIAGNOSTIC STRATEGIES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
DIEHL, AK .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 3 (03) :230-238
[8]  
FERNBACH JC, 1976, CAN MED ASSOC J, V115, P898
[9]   SELECTIVE CRITERIA MAY INCREASE LUMBOSACRAL SPINE ROENTGENOGRAM USE IN ACUTE LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
FRAZIER, LM ;
CAREY, TS ;
LYLES, MF ;
KHAYRALLAH, MA ;
MCGAGHIE, WC .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 149 (01) :47-50
[10]   METAANALYTIC METHODS FOR DIAGNOSTIC-TEST ACCURACY [J].
IRWIG, L ;
MACASKILL, P ;
GLASZIOU, P ;
FAHEY, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (01) :119-130