Assessing Ecosystem and Urban Services for Landscape Suitability Mapping

被引:3
|
作者
Antognelli, Sara [1 ]
Vizzari, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] Agricolus SRL, Via Settevalli 320, I-06129 Perugia, Italy
[2] Univ Perugia, Dept Agr Food & Environm Sci, I-06121 Perugia, Italy
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 17期
关键词
landscape planning; landscape liveability; landscape services; ecosystem and urban services; multicriteria decision analysis; analytical hierarchy process; kernel density estimation; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; INDICATORS; AHP; GIS; STAKEHOLDERS; MODEL; SUSTAINABILITY; IDENTIFICATION; ACCESSIBILITY;
D O I
10.3390/app11178232
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ES) and urban services (US) can comparably improve human well-being. Models for integrating ES and US with unexpressed and objective needs of defined groups of stakeholders may prove helpful for supporting decisions in landscape planning and management. In fact, they could be applied for highlighting landscape areas with different characteristics in terms of services provided. From this base, a suitability spatial assessment model (SUSAM) was developed and applied in a study area considering different verisimilar scenarios that policy makers could analyse. Each scenario is based on the prioritization of a set of services considering a defined group of stakeholders. Consistent and comparable ES and US indices of spatial benefiting areas (SBA) of services were calculated using GIS spatialization techniques. These indices were aggregated hierarchically with the relevance of services according to a spatial multicriteria decision analysis (S-MCDA). Results include maps for each scenario showing detailed spatial indices of suitability that integrate the local availability of SBA of ES and US, along with their relevance. The results were compared with known landscape classes identified in previous studies, which made it possible to interpret the spatial variation of suitability in the light of known landscape features. A complete sensitivity analysis was performed to test the sensitiveness of the model's outputs to variations of judgements and their resistance to the indicators' variation. The application of the model demonstrated its effectiveness in a landscape suitability assessment. At the same time, the sensitivity analysis and helping to understand the model behaviour in the different landscape classes also suggested possible solutions for simplifying the whole methodology.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mapping cultural ecosystem services: Connecting visual landscape quality to cost estimations for enhanced services provision
    Ungaro, F.
    Haefner, K.
    Zasada, I.
    Piorr, A.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 54 : 399 - 412
  • [22] Mapping and assessing freshwater ecosystem services supply and demand in Inner Mongolia (China)
    Zhou, Ao
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Pereira, Paulo
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2023, 38 (07) : 1885 - 1902
  • [23] Mapping and assessing ecosystem services for sustainable policy and decision-making in Eritrea
    Esmail, Blal Adem
    Cortinovis, Chiara
    Wang, Jingxia
    Geneletti, Davide
    Albert, Christian
    AMBIO, 2023, 52 (06) : 1022 - 1039
  • [24] Assessing Urban Resilience with Geodesign: A Case Study of Urban Landscape Planning in Belgrade, Serbia
    Mitrovic, Sandra
    Vasiljevic, Nevena
    Pjanovic, Bojana
    Dabovic, Tijana
    LAND, 2023, 12 (10)
  • [25] Identifying Landscape Characteristics That Maximize Ecosystem Services Provision
    Benedetti, Yanina
    Morelli, Federico
    Svitok, Marek
    Santolini, Riccardo
    Kadlecova, Petra
    Cavalli, Alice
    Strollo, Andrea
    Munafo, Michele
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [26] Assessing Urban Forest Structure, Ecosystem Services, and Economic Benefits on Vacant Land
    Kim, Gunwoo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (07):
  • [27] Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Services and Urban Sustainability
    Trinder, John C.
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 87 (03) : 189 - 195
  • [28] A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure
    Veerkamp, Clara J.
    Schipper, Aafke M.
    Hedlund, Katarina
    Lazarova, Tanya
    Nordin, Amanda
    Hanson, Helena I.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 52
  • [29] Who Pays the Bill? Assessing Ecosystem Services Losses in an Urban Planning Context
    Zepp, Harald
    Inostroza, Luis
    LAND, 2021, 10 (04)
  • [30] Ecosystem Services Along the Urban-Rural-Natural Gradient: An Approach for a Wide Area Assessment and Mapping
    Vizzari, Marco
    Antognelli, Sara
    Hilal, Mohamed
    Sigura, Maurizia
    Joly, Daniel
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2015, PT III, 2015, 9157 : 745 - 757