Meta-analysis: Low-dose dopamine increases urine output but does not prevent renal dysfunction or death

被引:260
作者
Friedrich, JO [1 ]
Adhikari, N [1 ]
Herridge, MS [1 ]
Beyene, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Toronto Gen Hosp,Hosp Sick Children, Univ Hlth Network,Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth S, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-142-7-200504050-00010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Surveys have documented the continued popularity of low-dose dopamine to influence renal dysfunction even though few data support it and editorials and reviews have discouraged its use. Purpose: To evaluate the effects of low-dose dopamine (<= 5 mu g/kg of body weight per minute) compared with placebo or no therapy in patients with or at risk for acute renal failure. Data Sources: MEDLINE (1966-January 2005), EMBASE (1980week 5, 2005), CANCERLIT (1975-2002), CINAHL (1982-January 2005), and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, fourth quarter, 2004); bibliographies of retrieved publications; and additional information from 50 trials. Study Selection: Two reviewers independently selected parallel group randomized and quasi -randomized controlled trials of lowdose dopamine versus control. Data Extraction: Study methods, clinical and renal physiologic outcomes, and adverse events (arrhythmias and myocardial, limb, and cutaneous ischemia) were extracted. Data Synthesis: 61 trials that randomly assigned 3359 patients were identified. Meta-analyses using random-effects models showed no effect of low-dose dopamine on mortality (relative risk, 0.96 [95% Cl, 0.78 to 1.191), need for renal replacement therapy (relative risk, 0.93 [Cl, 0.76 to 1.151), or adverse events (relative risk, 1.13 [Cl, 0.90 to 1.41]). Low-dose dopamine increased urine output by 24% (Cl, 14% to 35%) on day 1. Improvements in serum creatinine level (4% relative decrease [CI, 1% to 7%]) and measured creatinine clearance (6% relative increase [Cl, 1% to 11%]) on day 1 were clinically insignificant. There were no significant changes on days 2 and 3 of therapy. Limitations: Statistically significant between-study heterogeneity in physiologic but not clinical outcomes was unexplained by prespecified hypotheses. Conclusion: Low-dose dopamine offers transient improvements in renal physiology, but no good evidence shows that it offers important clinical benefits to patients with or at risk for acute renal failure.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 524
页数:15
相关论文
共 177 条
  • [1] Effects of dopamine and aminophylline on contrast-induced acute renal failure after coronary angioplasty in patients with preexisting renal insufficiency
    Abizaid, AS
    Clark, CE
    Mintz, GS
    Dosa, S
    Popma, JJ
    Pichard, D
    Satler, LF
    Harvey, M
    Kent, KM
    Leon, MB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (02) : 260 - +
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, TURK J MED SCI
  • [3] Nifedipine can preserve renal function in patients undergoing aortic surgery with infrarenal crossclamping
    Antonucci, F
    Calo, L
    Rizzolo, M
    Cantaro, S
    Bertolissi, M
    Travaglini, M
    Geatti, O
    Borsatti, A
    DAngelo, A
    [J]. NEPHRON, 1996, 74 (04): : 668 - 673
  • [4] ARMITAGE P, 2002, STAT METHODS MED RES, P147
  • [5] Can dopamine prevent the renal side effects of indomethacin? A prospective randomized clinical study
    Baenziger, O
    Waldvogel, K
    Ghelfi, D
    Arbenz, U
    Fanconi, S
    [J]. KLINISCHE PADIATRIE, 1999, 211 (06): : 438 - 441
  • [6] EFFECT OF POSTOPERATIVE LOW-DOSE DOPAMINE ON RENAL FUNCTION AFTER ELECTIVE MAJOR VASCULAR-SURGERY
    BALDWIN, L
    HENDERSON, A
    HICKMAN, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 120 (09) : 744 - 747
  • [7] BARRINGTON K, 2002, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003213
  • [8] Bellomo R, 2000, LANCET, V356, P2139
  • [9] Cardiovascular effects of intravenous triiodothyronine in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    BennettGuerrero, E
    Jimenez, JL
    White, WD
    DAmico, EB
    Baldwin, BI
    Schwinn, DA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (09): : 687 - 692
  • [10] Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head
    Berlin, JA
    Santanna, J
    Schmid, CH
    Szczech, LA
    Feldman, HI
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (03) : 371 - 387