Low-dose Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Termination in Women with a Prior Caesarean Delivery

被引:1
作者
Aydin, Emine [1 ]
Ozyuncu, Ozgur [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Abortion; Caesarean section; Induction; Prostaglandin; Uterine scars; LABOR INDUCTION; ABORTION;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2019/28209.13287
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Termination of Pregnancy (ToP) is an obstetric procedure that can be performed by surgical or medical techniques during the first or second trimester of pregnancy. Medical ToP is recommended in the second trimester owing to its low rate of maternal morbidity. Low-dose misoprostol is an effective option in such cases. Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of two different vaginal misoprostol regimens for ToP in the second trimester in women with previous Caesarean Deliveries (CDs), against controls. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a university hospital, between January 2005 to December 2014. The study cohort was divided into two groups: history of CD (Group I, n=85) and control (Group II, n=434). The method used for ToP was chosen with respect to history of CD. Four doses of 50 mu g misoprostol and 4 doses of 200 mu g misoprostol were applied vaginally each day, until regular uterine contractions were observed, to Groups I and II, respectively. Indication of ToP, gestational the ToP (weeks), duration from induction to abortion (hours), total misoprostol dose (pg), foetal weight (gram), post-abortion hospitalisation time (day), and any complications were recorded. The Chi-square or Fisher's-Exact test was used for qualitative data, and the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test was used for quantitative data. The p<0.05 was considered significant. Tests were performed using the SPSS statistical package for Windows, version 17 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Results: The success rate of termination was 91.8% (78/85) in Group I and 99.1% (430/434) in Group II (p<0.001). The median induction to abortion interval was 54.08 +/- 42.85 hours for Group I and 47.19 +/- 31.39 hours in Group II (p=0.371). One case of uterine rupture was recorded in Group I (p=0.164). The incidence of requiring transfusion for haemorrhages was higher in Group I than in Group II (5.9% vs. 1.6%, respectively, p=0.032). Conclusion: Low-dose vaginal misoprostol appears to be a safe and effective procedure for second trimester ToP in women with a history of CD.
引用
收藏
页码:QC05 / QC07
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intravaginal misoprostol alone versus intravaginal misoprostol and extraamniotic Foley catheter for second trimester pregnancy termination: an observational study
    Toptas, Tayfun
    Mendilcioglu, Inanc
    Simsek, Mehmet
    Taskin, Omur
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2014, 85 (08) : 577 - 581
  • [22] Second trimester pregnancy termination: A comparison of 600 and 800 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol
    Herabutya, Y
    Chanrachakul, B
    Punyavachira, P
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2001, 27 (03) : 125 - 128
  • [23] Mifepristone and misoprostol is safe and effective method in the second-trimester pregnancy termination
    Nissi, Ritva
    Santala, Markku
    Immonen, Eva
    Talvensaari-Mattila, Anne
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 294 (06) : 1243 - 1247
  • [24] The optimization of intravaginal misoprostol dosing schedules in second-trimester pregnancy termination
    Dickinson, JE
    Evans, SF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (03) : 470 - 474
  • [25] Cervical Dilators Used Concurrently With Misoprostol to Shorten Labor in Second-Trimester Termination of Pregnancy
    Anselem, Olivia
    Jouannic, Jean-Marie
    Winer, Norbert
    Bouchghoul, Hanane
    Vivanti, Alexandre J.
    Quibel, Thibault
    Massardier, Jerome
    Rousseau, Jessica
    Ancel, Pierre-Yves
    Goffinet, Francois
    Tsatsaris, Vassilis
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (03) : 453 - 460
  • [26] Vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination and effect on Doppler measurements
    Karsidag, A. Yasemin Karageyim
    Buyukbayrak, Esra E.
    Kars, Bulent
    Dansuk, Ramazan
    Unal, Orhan
    Turan, M. Cem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2009, 106 (03) : 250 - 253
  • [27] Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Buccal Misoprostol for Termination of Second-Trimester Pregnancy A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Al, Ragip A.
    Yapca, Omer E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (03) : 593 - 598
  • [28] How to manage unresponsiveness to misoprostol in failed second trimester pregnancy termination
    Pongsatha, Saipin
    Tongsong, Theera
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (01) : 154 - 159
  • [29] Vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal gemeprost in termination of second trimester pregnancy - A randomized trial
    Wong, KS
    Ngai, CSW
    Wong, AYK
    Tang, LCH
    Ho, PC
    CONTRACEPTION, 1998, 58 (04) : 207 - 210
  • [30] Unusual Posterior Wall Uterine Rupture with the Use of Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Termination
    Mariye, Yitbarek Fantahun
    Weldetensay, Eskinder Kebede
    Dribisa, Weyesa
    ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 32 (01) : 213 - 216