Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke

被引:98
作者
Chen, Chia-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Chung-Yao [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Hsieh-Ching [5 ]
Wu, Ching-Yi [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Keh-Chung [7 ,8 ]
Hsieh, Yu-Wei [6 ]
Shen, I-Hsuan [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, 5 Fu Hsing St, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Early Intervent, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Keelung, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Occupat Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Stroke; Muscle spasticity; Minimal clinically important difference; Psychometrics; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RELIABILITY; SPASTICITY; OUTCOMES; INTERRATER; CRITERIA; TOOLS; INDEX; TONE;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05545-X
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a major problem in patients with stroke and influences their activities of daily living, participation, and quality of life. The Modified Ashworth Scale is widely used to assess spasticity. However, the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke have not been explored. AIM: This study aims to examine the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Longitudinal six-month follow-up study. SETTING: Rehabilitation wards of a tertiary hospital. POPULATION: One-hundred and fifteen patients with stroke were recruited. METHODS: All patients underwent the assessment of Modified Ashworth Scale for the upper extremity (flexors of the elbow, wrist, and fingers) and the lower extremity (hip adductor, knee flexor, and ankle plantar flexor) at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The average Modified Ashworth Scale scores of the upper and lower extremity muscles were obtained for analysis. Responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale was determined using standardized mean response, and the minimal clinically important differences were determined using a distribution-based approach with Effect Sizes of 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations. RESULTS: The responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the upper and lower extremity muscles was marked (standardized response mean = 0.89-1.09). The minimal clinically important differences of the average Modified Ashworth Scale of Effect Sizes 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations for the upper extremity muscles were 0.48 and 0.76, respectively, while those for the lower extremity muscles were 0.45 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Ashworth Scale was markedly responsive in detecting the changes in muscle tone in patients with stroke. The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study can be used by researchers and clinicians in determining whether the observed changes are clinically meaningful post-treatment or at follow-up. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study will enable clinicians and researchers in determining whether changes in the muscle tone are true and clinically meaningful, and can be used as a reference for clinical decision-making. Key words: stroke, muscle spasticity, minimal clinically important difference, psychometrics
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 760
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The minimal clinically important difference in Berg Balance Scale scores among patients with early subacute stroke: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study
    Tamura, Shuntaro
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Kobayashi, Sota
    Takeda, Ren
    Iwamoto, Hiroaki
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2022, 29 (06) : 423 - 429
  • [42] Establishing Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (Hindi Version) in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Undergoing Multimodal Physical Therapy
    Ahmad, Irshad
    Sharma, Akhil
    Zaidi, Sahar
    Alshahrani, Mastour Saeed
    Gautam, Ajay Prashad
    Raizah, Abdullah
    Reddy, Ravi Shankar
    Verma, Shalini
    Tanwar, Tarushi
    Hussain, Mohammad Ejaz
    Malhotra, Deepak
    Uddin, Shadab
    Mukhtar, Emadeldin Mohammed
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (04)
  • [43] Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of upper extremity outcome measures in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe impairment: a cross-sectional study
    Uchiyama, Yuki
    Takebayashi, Takashi
    Takahashi, Kayoko
    Amano, Satoru
    Gosho, Masahiko
    Sakai, Masahiro
    Hashimoto, Koichi
    Hachisuka, Kenji
    Domen, Kazuhisa
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2024, 31 (04) : 409 - 417
  • [44] The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Patients With Cancer With Agitated Delirium
    Hui, David
    Hess, Kenneth
    Dibaj, Seyedeh S.
    Arthur, Joseph
    Dev, Rony
    Dalal, Shalini
    Reddy, Suresh
    Bruera, Eduardo
    CANCER, 2018, 124 (10) : 2246 - 2252
  • [45] The validity, reliability, responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the de Morton mobility index in rehabilitation
    New, Peter Wayne
    Scroggie, Grant David
    Williams, Cylie Michelle
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (10) : 1039 - 1043
  • [46] Examining the Function In Sitting Test for Validity, Responsiveness, and Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Inpatient Rehabilitation
    Gorman, Sharon L.
    Harro, Cathy C.
    Platko, Christina
    Greenwald, Cara
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (12): : 2304 - 2311
  • [47] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
    M. Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada
    A. Bilbao
    L. Ansola
    R. Quirós
    L. García-Perez
    G. Navarro
    A. Escobar
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17
  • [48] Minimal and robust clinically important difference of three fatigue measures in chronic stroke survivors
    Cheraghifard, Moslem
    Sarlak, Nazanin
    Taghizadeh, Ghorban
    Azad, Akram
    Fallah, Soheila
    Akbarfahimi, Malahat
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2023, 30 (05) : 522 - 531
  • [49] Minimal clinically important difference of Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (GAIT) in patients with sub-acute stroke
    Saengsuwan, Jittima
    Vichiansiri, Ratana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2021, 57 (06) : 874 - 878
  • [50] Construct validity, responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire in individuals receiving stroke rehabilitation
    Wu, Sz-Yan
    Li, Yi-Chun
    Chen, Yu-Wen
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Pan, Hsiao-Chieh
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Lau, Hiu-Ying
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (25) : 6195 - 6203