Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke

被引:98
|
作者
Chen, Chia-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Chung-Yao [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Hsieh-Ching [5 ]
Wu, Ching-Yi [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Keh-Chung [7 ,8 ]
Hsieh, Yu-Wei [6 ]
Shen, I-Hsuan [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, 5 Fu Hsing St, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Early Intervent, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Keelung, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Occupat Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Stroke; Muscle spasticity; Minimal clinically important difference; Psychometrics; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RELIABILITY; SPASTICITY; OUTCOMES; INTERRATER; CRITERIA; TOOLS; INDEX; TONE;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05545-X
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a major problem in patients with stroke and influences their activities of daily living, participation, and quality of life. The Modified Ashworth Scale is widely used to assess spasticity. However, the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke have not been explored. AIM: This study aims to examine the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Longitudinal six-month follow-up study. SETTING: Rehabilitation wards of a tertiary hospital. POPULATION: One-hundred and fifteen patients with stroke were recruited. METHODS: All patients underwent the assessment of Modified Ashworth Scale for the upper extremity (flexors of the elbow, wrist, and fingers) and the lower extremity (hip adductor, knee flexor, and ankle plantar flexor) at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The average Modified Ashworth Scale scores of the upper and lower extremity muscles were obtained for analysis. Responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale was determined using standardized mean response, and the minimal clinically important differences were determined using a distribution-based approach with Effect Sizes of 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations. RESULTS: The responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the upper and lower extremity muscles was marked (standardized response mean = 0.89-1.09). The minimal clinically important differences of the average Modified Ashworth Scale of Effect Sizes 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations for the upper extremity muscles were 0.48 and 0.76, respectively, while those for the lower extremity muscles were 0.45 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Ashworth Scale was markedly responsive in detecting the changes in muscle tone in patients with stroke. The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study can be used by researchers and clinicians in determining whether the observed changes are clinically meaningful post-treatment or at follow-up. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study will enable clinicians and researchers in determining whether changes in the muscle tone are true and clinically meaningful, and can be used as a reference for clinical decision-making. Key words: stroke, muscle spasticity, minimal clinically important difference, psychometrics
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 760
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of Edinburgh postnatal depression scale
    Mao, Fangxiang
    Sun, Yaoyao
    Wang, Juan
    Huang, Yongqi
    Lu, Yane
    Cao, Fenglin
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 66
  • [22] Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale After Stroke for 13 Muscle Groups
    Vidmar, Tjasa
    Kregar, Nika Goljar
    Puh, Urska
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 104 (10): : 1606 - 1611
  • [23] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
    Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada, M.
    Bilbao, A.
    Ansola, L.
    Quirs, R.
    Garcia-Perez, L.
    Navarro, G.
    Escobar, A.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [24] The minimal important difference for the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients in the subacute stage
    Lien, Hung-Pin
    Shieh, Yun-Jer
    Chen, Chih-Ping
    Huang, Yi-Jing
    Wang, Inga
    Chen, Mei-Hsiang
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [25] The minimal clinically important difference of the mini-balance evaluation systems test in patients with early subacute stroke
    Takeda, Ren
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Igarashi, Tatsuya
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2023, 30 (07) : 672 - 680
  • [26] Minimal clinically important difference of modified dynamic gait index in people with neurological disorders
    Corrini, Chiara
    Torchio, Alessandro
    Anastasi, Denise
    Parelli, Riccardo
    Meotti, Matteo
    Spedicato, Albino
    Groppo, Elisabetta
    D'Arma, Alessia
    Grosso, Cristina
    Montesano, Angelo
    Cattaneo, Davide
    Gervasoni, Elisa
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2021, 90 : 210 - 214
  • [27] Assessing the reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale between two physiotherapists in adult patients with hemiplegia
    Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
    Naghdi, Soofia
    Hasson, Scott
    Fakhari, Zahra
    Mashayekhi, Masoud
    Herasi, Mona
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2009, 25 (04) : 235 - 240
  • [28] Minimal clinically important difference of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale in Parkinson's disease
    Kluger, Benzi M.
    Garimella, Sanjana
    Garvan, Cynthia
    PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2017, 43 : 101 - 104
  • [29] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord injury (TASS)
    Sato, Hiroki
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Yoshikawa, Kenichi
    Chiba, Shuhei
    Mizukami, Masafumi
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2025, 48 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [30] Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Chernyshov, Pavel V.
    Marron, Servando E.
    Koumaki, Dimitra
    Pustisek, Nives
    Manolache, Liana
    Salavastru, Carmen
    Suru, Alina
    Sendrea, Adelina
    Svyatenko, Tetiana
    Statkevych, Olha
    Boffa, Michael J.
    Grech, Sara Borg
    Zemskov, Sergii
    Kuts, Volodymyr V.
    Lishchynskyi, Pavlo
    Chernyshov, Andrii V.
    Tomas-Aragones, Lucia
    DERMATOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2023, : 2879 - 2893