Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke

被引:98
|
作者
Chen, Chia-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Chung-Yao [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Hsieh-Ching [5 ]
Wu, Ching-Yi [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Keh-Chung [7 ,8 ]
Hsieh, Yu-Wei [6 ]
Shen, I-Hsuan [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, 5 Fu Hsing St, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Early Intervent, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Keelung, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Occupat Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Stroke; Muscle spasticity; Minimal clinically important difference; Psychometrics; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RELIABILITY; SPASTICITY; OUTCOMES; INTERRATER; CRITERIA; TOOLS; INDEX; TONE;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05545-X
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a major problem in patients with stroke and influences their activities of daily living, participation, and quality of life. The Modified Ashworth Scale is widely used to assess spasticity. However, the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke have not been explored. AIM: This study aims to examine the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Longitudinal six-month follow-up study. SETTING: Rehabilitation wards of a tertiary hospital. POPULATION: One-hundred and fifteen patients with stroke were recruited. METHODS: All patients underwent the assessment of Modified Ashworth Scale for the upper extremity (flexors of the elbow, wrist, and fingers) and the lower extremity (hip adductor, knee flexor, and ankle plantar flexor) at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The average Modified Ashworth Scale scores of the upper and lower extremity muscles were obtained for analysis. Responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale was determined using standardized mean response, and the minimal clinically important differences were determined using a distribution-based approach with Effect Sizes of 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations. RESULTS: The responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the upper and lower extremity muscles was marked (standardized response mean = 0.89-1.09). The minimal clinically important differences of the average Modified Ashworth Scale of Effect Sizes 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations for the upper extremity muscles were 0.48 and 0.76, respectively, while those for the lower extremity muscles were 0.45 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Ashworth Scale was markedly responsive in detecting the changes in muscle tone in patients with stroke. The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study can be used by researchers and clinicians in determining whether the observed changes are clinically meaningful post-treatment or at follow-up. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study will enable clinicians and researchers in determining whether changes in the muscle tone are true and clinically meaningful, and can be used as a reference for clinical decision-making. Key words: stroke, muscle spasticity, minimal clinically important difference, psychometrics
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 760
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Scales Reported in Stroke Trials: A Review
    Mishra, Biswamohan
    Sudheer, Pachipala
    Agarwal, Ayush
    Nilima, Nilima
    Srivastava, Madakasira Vasantha Padma
    Vishnu, Venugopalan Y.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [12] Validation of the minimal clinically important difference for modified activities assessment scale
    Neela, Niharika
    Olavarria, Oscar A.
    Rondon, Alexis P.
    Bernardi, Karla
    Shah, Puja
    Dhanani, Naila
    Lyons, Nicole
    Matta, Eduardo J.
    Hasapes, Joseph P.
    Liang, Mike K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 223 (04) : 770 - 773
  • [13] Estimating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of an Upper Extremity Recovery Measure in Subacute Stroke Patients
    Arya, Kamal Narayan
    Verma, Rajesh
    Garg, R. K.
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2011, 18 : 599 - 610
  • [14] The minimal clinically important difference of the motricity index score
    Lin, Chen
    Arevalo, Yurany A.
    Harvey, Richard L.
    Prabhakaran, Shyam
    Martin, Kimberly D.
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2023, 30 (03) : 298 - 303
  • [15] Establishing minimal clinically important difference of modified dynamic gait index in people with subacute stroke
    Mestanza Mattos, Fabiola Giovanna
    Bowman, Thomas
    Allera Longo, Cristina
    Bocini, Serena
    Gennuso, Michele
    Marazzini, Francesca
    Materazzi, Francesco Giuseppe
    Pelosin, Elisa
    Putzolu, Martina
    Salvalaggio, Silvia
    Turolla, Andrea
    Mezzarobba, Susanna
    Cattaneo, Davide
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2025,
  • [16] Minimal clinically important difference of the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed in patients with acute stroke: A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study
    Hayashi, Shota
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Takeda, Ren
    Iizuka, Takamitsu
    Igarashi, Tatsuya
    Usuda, Shigeru
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 36 (11) : 1512 - 1523
  • [17] Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke
    Beninato, M
    Gill-Body, KM
    Salles, S
    Stark, PC
    Black-Schaffer, RM
    Stein, J
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (01): : 32 - 39
  • [18] Minimal clinically important differenceof fatigue severity scale in patients with chronic stroke
    Taghizadeh, Ghorban
    Sarlak, Nazanin
    Fallah, Soheila
    Sharabiani, Parvaneh Taghavi Azar
    Cheraghifard, Moslem
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 33 (04)
  • [19] Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
    Poyu Chen
    Keh-Chung Lin
    Rong-Jiuan Liing
    Ching-Yi Wu
    Chia-Ling Chen
    Ku-Chou Chang
    Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25 : 1585 - 1596
  • [20] Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients
    Hsieh, Yu-Wei
    Wang, Chun-Hou
    Wu, Shwu-Chong
    Chen, Pau-Chung
    Sheu, Ching-Fan
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2007, 21 (03) : 233 - 238