Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Two Oral Formulations of Regorafenib: An Open-Label, Randomised, Single-Dose, Two-Period, Two-Way Crossover Clinical Trial in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions

被引:6
作者
Zhang, Qian [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zhiqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Jingying [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Zhen [3 ]
Zhou, Renpeng [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Prov Inst Translat Med, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
regorafenib; phase; 1; pharmacokinetic; bioequivalence; Chinese healthy volunteers; COLORECTAL-CANCER; BAY; 73-4506;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S323169
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Background: Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of solid tumours, but the pharmacokinetic profile of regorafenib in the Chinese population is unclear. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety of two formulations of regorafenib 40 mg in healthy Chinese volunteers under fed and fasting conditions. Methods: A single-centre, randomised, open-label, two-period, two-way crossover phase 1 trial was conducted by randomising a single oral dose of test (T) or reference (R, Stivarga) regorafenib (40 mg) to healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions (high-fat and high-calorie diet). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Adverse events were recorded to assess drug safety. Results: Sixty-six participants were enrolled for both fasting and fed treatments. The 90% CIs geometric least-square means of ratio T/R for regorafenib were completely contained within the equivalence margin of 80-125% under both fasting and fed conditions. Both formulations displayed similar and generally good safety profiles. Conclusion: Single oral dose of the T (40 mg) and R (40 mg) regorafenib was bioequivalent under fasting and fed conditions and had similar favourable safety profiles among healthy Chinese volunteers.
引用
收藏
页码:3277 / 3288
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STIVARGA SUMMARY PRO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, STIVARGA PRODUCT MON
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STIVARGA REGORAFENIB
[4]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[5]   Cancer Statistics in China, 2015 [J].
Chen, Wanqing ;
Zheng, Rongshou ;
Baade, Peter D. ;
Zhang, Siwei ;
Zeng, Hongmei ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Yu, Xue Qin ;
He, Jie .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (02) :115-132
[6]   Regorafenib: A Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [J].
Dhillon, Sohita .
DRUGS, 2018, 78 (11) :1133-1144
[7]   Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) [J].
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Mendoza, Tito R. ;
Mitchell, Sandra A. ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Castro, Kathleen M. ;
Rogak, Lauren J. ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Denicoff, Andrea M. ;
O'Mara, Ann M. ;
Li, Yuelin ;
Clauser, Steven B. ;
Bryant, Donna M. ;
Bearden, James D., III ;
Gillis, Theresa A. ;
Harness, Jay K. ;
Siegel, Robert D. ;
Paul, Diane B. ;
Cleeland, Charles S. ;
Schrag, Deborah ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Bruner, Deborah W. ;
Minasian, Lori M. ;
Basch, Ethan .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (08) :1051-1059
[8]   Food Effect Study Design With Oral Drugs: Lessons Learned From Recently Approved Drugs in Oncology [J].
Farha, Mark ;
Masson, Eric ;
Tomkinson, Helen ;
Mugundu, Ganesh .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 59 (04) :463-471
[9]  
FDA, 2014, DRAFT GUID REG
[10]  
FDA, 2021, Draft guidance on regorafenib